ANZCTR search results

These search results are from the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR).

You can narrow down the results using the filters

32894 results sorted by trial registration date.
  • The safety and efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the ablation of prostate cancer assessed by procedural related side effects and post prostatectomy histology: A pilot study

    Ablation techniques are used to directly destroy tumours within an organ. The location of the tumours is predetermined with imaging. With image guidance, needles are inserted through the skin (percutaneously) into the tumour and an energy field (heat, cold, microwaves, ultrasound etc) is used to destroy the tumour cells. Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) is a new ablation technology that has been shown to have advantages over other more established technologies. It uses high voltage direct electrical current to open the cell membranes and destroy tumours but spares surrounding tissues and vital structures such as nerves and blood vessels. The Study: Current surgical and ablative treatment options for prostate cancer have a relatively high incidence of side effects, mainly incontinence and erectile dysfunction, that diminish the quality of life of prostate cancer sufferers and impact on patients’ decision to undergo early, potentially curative treatments. These side effects are due to procedure related damage of the blood vessels, ureter and/or neurovascular bundle. New treatments that limit damage to these structures have the potential to improve patient outcomes. Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) has been shown to be effective in destroying tumour cells and to have the advantage of sparing surrounding tissue and vital structures such as blood vessels and neurones. It is therefore postulated that this advantage may help reduce or avoid these side effects. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, precision and cost of minimally invasive, percutaneous, image guided IRE for the ablation of prostate cancer. Who is it for? This study is eligible for up to six patients diagnosed with confirmed prostate cancer with no evidence of lymph node or distant metastases, categorised as low risk (as defined by the American Urological Association Guideline for Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: 2007 Update, as a clinical score of T1-2a, a Gleason score of 7 (3+4 only) or less, and a PSA less than or equal to 10 ng/ml) and scheduled for a radical prostatectomy by the treating urologist will have the IRE procedure 14-30 days before the prostatectomy. Participants will have preprocedure urological and prostate cancer assessments (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). A specified ablation zone will be predetermined using the same preplanning used for conventional brachytherapy treatment. The procedure for planning and performing brachytherapy is well established in the Radiation Oncology Department at The Alfred. It involves determining the volume (size and shape) of the prostate. Trial Details In this study, you will undergo Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) procedure which involves two fine needle electrodes being placed percutaneously into the prostate in the same way as a biopsy is performed. An electric current is passed between the needle electrodes, which causes the pores of the cell membranes to open, thereby killing the cells. The procedure will take about an hour and a half, and will be performed by either the study urologist or study radiation oncologist with assistance with the technology by the study radiologists. You will then be followed up at 1, 2 and 4 weeks, where testing for any adverse events and urological and prostate assessments will be performed. When the prostate is removed it will be examined histologically (microscopically) to ascertain the effectiveness of ablation by the Anatomical Pathology Department at The Alfred. We will be able to know if complete ablation of the specified area was achieved.

  • Phase I/II BNC105P combination study in partially platinum sensitive ovarian cancer patients in first or second relapse

    This study will evaluate the effect of combining standard chemotherapy with the drug, BNC105P, for the treatment of partially platinum sensitive ovarian cancer. Who is it for? You may be eligible to join this study if you are a female aged 18years or above and have a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer or fallopian tube cancer, for which you have undergone first or second line platinum based chemotherapy. Your cancer should not have progressed for at least 4 months following this chemotherapy. Trial details There are two parts to this study. Each participant will be involved in one part only. In part 1 of the study, participants will undergo chemotherapy with carboplatin, gemcitabine, and BNC105P for up to 6 cycles (each cycle is 21 days). Subsequent patients will receive escalating doses of these drugs in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Participants will then undergo a further 6 cycles of maintenance therapy with BNC105P only. Participants enrolled in part 2 of this study will be randomly (by chance) allocated to one of two groups. Both groups will undergo standard chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Gemcitabine for 6 cycles (each cycle is 21 days). However, one group will also receive the maximum tolerated dose (determined in part 1 of the study) of BNC105P during these cycles. Both groups will then undergo a maximum of 6 cycles of maintenance therapy with BNC105P. Participants in both parts of the study will be assessed at regular intervals in order to evaluate the safety of treatment, response rate, and quality of life.

  • An open trial of a self-guided internet-delivered treatment program for obsessive-compulsive disorder

    The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of a self-guided internet treatment program for OCD. It is hypothesized that: 1. The treatment group will show significant improvement on primary measures of OCD symptoms relative to baseline and 2. The treatment will be deemed as acceptable by participants

  • The impact of intramedullary (in the bone) nails versus sliding hip screws on health-related quality of life in patients with hip fracture

  • OM-85 in the prevention of asthma in high-risk children

    Persistent asthma is a major problem yet none of the current therapies do more than control the condition. The long-term solution is to prevent asthma from progressing to the persistent form. The major risk factors are: family history, early allergy and recurrent severe lower respiratory infections (sLRI) in the early life. We will conduct a randomized clinical trial to prevent sLRI using a novel bacterial-derived immunostimulant (OM-85) in infants at high risk of developing asthma. OM-85 works by priming the immune system so that body can respond quickly to infections. This will help reduce damage to the lungs during sLRI's and may prevent asthma from developing.

  • CanPrevent: An intervention to improve lifestyle factors and decrease risk of colorectal cancer

    CanPrevent: This study investigates the feasibility and short-term effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention for first degree relatives of colorectal cancer survivors. Who is it for? First degree relatives (parents, siblings, and children) of someone with a confirmed diagnosis of primary colorectal cancer (C18-C20, C218). Intervention Details Participants will receive six x one hour telephone health coaching sessions over a six week period delivered by study-trained health professionals (‘health coaches’). They will also receive (i) a participant handbook including educational information on lifestyle factors and colorectal cancer screening, (ii) worksheets and (ii) a pedometer. Project Outcomes This project will provide essential information to inform the development of a larger scale randomised controlled trial of the approach. If successful, short term study outcomes will include improved lifestyle factors and health-related quality of life potentially resulting in reduced risk of colorectal cancer, other cancers and other chronic conditions.

  • The effects of self-treatment on duration of exacerbations, health status and costs of health care in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and common co-morbidities.

    COPD is a leading cause of death in Australia and its prevalence is increasing globally. The majority of disease burden and costs in COPD are due to treatment of exacerbations, with hospitalisations being the major component. Almost all comorbidities exist more frequently in COPD patients compared to matched elderly populations. One third of COPD patients admitted to hospital have at least four coded comorbidities, and these add to the length of hospital stay. In selected populations of COPD patients, training in the use of COPD action plans reduces COPD exacerbation severity, emergency department visits, hospitalisations and health costs and improves health status. However, overlap in symptoms of COPD and comorbidities complicate the use of COPD action plans in the large group of patients with comorbidities. For example, in a COPD patient with comorbid cardiovascular disease, worsening of his dyspnoea can relate to either disease. Use of only a COPD action plan could lead to incorrect actions and/or delay of proper treatment. We have developed self-treatment training with ongoing nurse support for complex COPD patients. Feedback to patients from nurses is vital to optimize use of action plans. We will enrol 300 COPD patients (150 in each of Australia and the Netherlands) with at least one of the following comorbidity: ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes, or anxiety/depression. All patients will complete daily symptom diaries for 12 months. Control patients will receive usual care and training in diary completion. Intervention patients will be trained in the use of individualized action plans. We hypothesize that this novel self-treatment strategy will reduce exacerbation severity, hospitalisation stay and costs, and improve quality of life.

  • Permissive HyperthErmiA Through Avoidance of Paracetamol in Known or Suspected Infection in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

    Fever is an adaptive response to infections which occurs widely in the animal kingdom. The suppression of fever increases the risk of mortality in animals, although the effect of antipyretics in critically ill patients is unknown. The objective of this study is to determine whether paracetamol influences the risk of mortality in critically ill patients with fever and known or suspected infection. A phase 2b double blind randomised placebo controlled trial of paracetamol will be undertaken in 700 patients with fever and known or suspected infection in New Zealand and Australia under the auspices of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group (ANZICS CTG). If either the aggressive or permissive antipyretic regimes influence outcomes including survival in patients with fever and infection, the findings will have a major impact on the burden of infectious disease in New Zealand and internationally. Pilot study registered at http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12611000981921.aspx

  • A pilot safety and acceptability trial of moderated on-line social therapy (MOST) for first-episode psychosis.

    In this study we will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, safety and initial clinical benefits of an online intervention (HORYZONS) designed to maintain the benefits of early intervention services for psychosis over the long term. We expect that HORYZONS will be well-received, safe and seen as a valuable treatment option by young people suffering from psychosis.

  • Clinical outcomes and cardiovascular responses to High Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Heart Failure Patients: A randomized, controlled trial.

    This study aims to build on the work by Wisoff 2007 published in circulation that showed superior benefits of high intensity interval training over moderate intensity continuous training in heart failure patients. It is hoped that with a larger sample size and longer follow up and intervention period the primary outcome, mortality will be significantly improved.

Tags:
  • Finding clinical trials