ANZCTR search results

These search results are from the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR).

You can narrow down the results using the filters

32914 results sorted by trial registration date.
  • A Phase I/II trial to evaluate gefitinib and concurrent postoperative chemoradiation in patients with advanced resectable head and neck cancer

  • Gemcitabine and carboplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin and IMRT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

  • Defining interactions between anabolic and peptide hormones: requirement for a robust test for growth hormone doping.

  • Can routine N-of-1 studies improve net benefits and reduce costs by better targeting chronic therapy?

  • Improving informed consent to clinical trials: Evaluating a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II).

  • The STEAL Study

    Combination antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV has a high pill burden. Two dual-tablets, abacavir-lamivudine and tenofovir-emtricitabine, are now licensed in the United States and will be available in Australia in December 2005. Data available suggest that the potency of these tablets are similar in controlling replication of the HIV virus, but not have not been directly compared in regard to clinically significant toxicities. We therefore aim to compare the overall safety and efficacy of the two dual-tablets over a 2 year period in HIV infected adults. We hypothesise that the two dual-NRTI treatments will be similar in efficacy and safety.

  • beta blockers and lung function in heart failure

    This study will compare 3 beta blocker tablets routinely used in treating patients with heart failure. There are theoretical reasons for differences between the tablets (particularly with respect to lung function and blood pressure changes), although this has not been tested in head-to-head comparison.

  • Effects of shoes insoles on symptoms and disease progression in knee osteoarthritis

    Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful and costly condition. Wedged shoe insoles are a simple intervention that may reduce pain and slow disease progression in people with knee OA and bow legs. They are thought to work by changing the alignment of the knee, altering muscle activity and ultimately reducing load across the knee joint. This project will compare the effect of a lateral wedged insole and a flat insole to see whether the lateral wedges are a useful treatment for people with knee OA. Participants will be screened over the phone first then will attend the Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine for further screening to assess their suitability. If they pass the screening, they will undergo baseline testing at the Centre which will take around 2 hours. They will complete questionnaires about their knee pain and function, quality of life, expectation of treatment benefit, physical activity levels and self motivation. Measurements will also be taken of walking, muscle strength, and foot type. Participants will attend the Epworth Hospital for a magnetic resonance imaging scan of the knee which will take about 1 hour. Participants will be randomly allocated into one of two groups (i) wedged shoe insoles (ii) control shoe insoles (with no wedging). Participants will wear the insoles in both shoes full time for 12 months. They will be provided with several pairs for replacement and for different shoes. Participants will be asked to complete a log-book during this time to record their insole wear compliance, any negative effects of the insoles, medication use, visits to health professionals and any additional home support. Some of the questionnaires will be completed at home after wearing the insoles for 6 months. At 12 months, participants will return to the Centre for repeat testing and to the Epworth for another knee scan.

  • Ultrasound Study

  • General practitioner survey to assess attitudes to varicella immunisation

Tags:
  • Finding clinical trials