ANZCTR search results

This is a multi-center, open-label Phase 0 Master Protocol in Australia designed to study the localized pharmacodynamics (PD) of anti-cancer therapies within the tumour microenvironment (TME) when administered intratumourally in microdose quantities via the CIVO device in patients with surface accessible solid tumours for which there is a scheduled surgical intervention. CIVO stands for Comparative In Vivo Oncology. Multiple substudies will include specified investigational agents and combinations to be evaluated.

This study is a 6-month, prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1:1), subject-masked and evaluator-masked, bilateral clinical investigation of the TECNIS IOL Models C1V000 and C2V000 versus the TECNIS Eyhance™ Model ICB00 IOL. The study will be conducted at up to 15 sites in EU, AU, NZ and/or AP and will enroll up to 225 subjects to achieve approximately 67 bilaterally implanted subjects in each lens group. Allowing for 10% lost-to-follow-up, this will achieve approximately 60 evaluable subjects in each lens group at 1, 3, and 6 months. The eye implanted first will be considered the primary (monocular) study eye.

In the case of primary surgery, in patients with sentinel node involvement, it has already been shown that omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), often combining axillary radiotherapy (RT), does not worsen the prognosis and does significantly reduce the appearance of lymphedema. However, patients who have received neoadjuvant systemic treatment cannot benefit from this option, even though in the majority of those who have responded well to treatment, a residual disease in the armpit is low, but there are no studies yet published that supports the possibility of not performing lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint is to evaluate wether axillary radiotherapy (ART) presents a lower risk of lymphedema with respect to lymphadenectomy (ALND) in patients with breast cancer who, after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST), present the sentinel node affected. Likewise, we will evaluate recurrences and overall survival in both groups. Finally, we will analyze the quality of life of these patients.

This study objective is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN 3 / SAPIEN 3 Ultra / SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Transcatheter Heart Valve systems in subjects with moderate, calcific aortic stenosis. Following completion of enrollment, subjects will be eligible for enrollment in the continued access phase of the trial.

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory disease of the joints causing pain, stiffness, swelling and loss of joint function. This study evaluated how safe and effective ABBV-154 is in participants treated for moderately to severely active RA. Adverse events and change in the disease activity were assessed. ABBV-154 is an investigational drug being evaluated for the treatment of RA. Study doctors placed the participants in 1 of 5 treatment groups or arms; each arm received a different treatment. There was a 1 in 5 chance that participants were assigned to placebo. Participants 18-75 years of age with moderate to severe RA were enrolled. Around 425 participants were to be enrolled in the study at approximately 270 sites worldwide. The study was comprised of a 12 week placebo-controlled period, a double-blind long term extension (LTE) period 1 of 66 weeks, a LTE period 2 of 104 weeks and a follow-up visit 70 days after the last dose of the study drug. In the LTE period 1, participants in the placebo group were re-randomized to receive ABBV-154 at 1 of 2 different doses SC every other week (EOW). Other participants remained on their previous dose and dosing regimen of ABBV-154. There may have been a higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants attended regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment was checked by medical assessments, blood tests, and side effects, and completing questionnaires.

Feasibility, safety and performance of the HighLife CLARITY TSMV and its delivery system

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of CC-486 (ONUREG®) in combination with venetoclax in relapsed and/or refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and newly diagnosed AML.

Randomized (1:1), double-blind, sham-controlled, 2-arm parallel study comparing effectiveness and safety of non-hormonal medical device versus sham device to treat VVA in post-menopausal women.

This is phase 1 first-in-human trial evaluating SRT-015 to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics. This study will be conducted in 3 parts - SAD, MAD and Food Effect with target of 96 healthy volunteers. This will be a single center, Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, SAD and MAD study of dose escalation cohorts evaluating administration of SRT-015 or placebo. Additionally, PK will be assessed in fed and fasting states.

The study has 2 parts. The first part is open to adults with different types of advanced cancer (solid tumours with changes in the HER2 gene) for whom previous treatment was not successful. The second part is open to people with non-small cell lung cancer with a specific mutation in the HER2 gene. The purpose of the first study part is to find the highest dose of a medicine called zongertinib the participants can tolerate. Once this dose is found, it will be used in the second study part to test whether zongertinib can make tumours shrink. In this study, zongertinib is given to people for the first time. Participants take zongertinib as tablets once a day or twice a day. The participants are in the study for as long as they benefit from and can tolerate treatment. Study doctors regularly check the participants' health and monitor the tumours. The doctors also take note of any unwanted effects that could have been caused by zongertinib.