You can narrow down the results using the filters
-
A study looking at the use of Mfolfirinox Chemotherapy And Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced pancreatic cancer to evaluate if this is a feasible treatment option with acceptable acute toxicity rates.
Expand descriptionThis study will qualitatively and quantitatively assess MRI and PET (18F-MISO and if available, 18FDG-PET) for the treatment response assessment of pancreatic cancer patients treated using mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (which is the current standard of care for chemotherapy) combined with SBRT. The feasibility of the combination of these two therapies will be assessed according to acceptable toxicity rates. Who is it for? You may be eligible to join this study if you are aged 18 years to 69 years and have been diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma or unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Study details: All patients who are enrolled in the study will receive the standard pre-treatment work-up, study treatment of mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy combined with SBRT and post treatment surveillance. In addition patients will be subjected to 3 additional MRIs, 2 two additional 18FDG-PET and 3 additional 18F-MISO PET (if available) conducted up to 4 weeks following completion of SBRT. Patients will also be subjected to study blood tests. Some blood tests may be part of standard care but those that are not will be included with the standard of care blood tests with additional blood taken and if not part of standard collection, will be taken at the correct timepoint for the study. Patients will be asked to complete QoL questionnaires at 7 timepoints throughout the study. Those patients that are determined to have resectable cancer by the multidisciplinary team following their treatment will proceed to surgical removal of their tumour. Follow up will continue on patients who have resectable or unresectable cancer for 24 months following treatment. This study will inform the design of a larger, randomised, multicentre trial.
-
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of AB122 in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors
Expand descriptionThis research study is testing the safety and tolerability of a potential new drug called AB122 in subjects with advanced solid tumours. Who is it for? You may be eligible to join this study if you are aged 18 years or over and have a pathologically confirmed solid cancer that is metastatic, advanced or recurrent with progression for which no alternative or curative therapy exists or standard therapy is not considered appropriate by the subject and treating physician. Study details A major purpose of this study is to find a safe dose range of AB122 that can be given to humans with cancer. To do this, multiple study cohorts will be enrolled and receive ascending doses of AB122. This means that if one dose has passed the safety and tolerability review, the next higher dose will be given to the subsequent patient cohort. The study will stop once the maximum tolerable dose is determined. In addition, the study will look at the amount of study drug in the blood to evaluate the way the body processes the study drug (pharmacokinetics) and the way the study drug affects the growth of tumours in cancer patients (pharmacodynamics). This research study will help us understand whether AB122, the study drug, can be safely given to patients with cancer.
-
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Randomised, Two-Way Crossover Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Relative Bioavailability and Food-Effect of a Single Dose of an Immediate Release and Extended Release Formulation of Propagermanium in Healthy Volunteers
Expand descriptionThis is a single-centre, randomised, open-label, two-way crossover, single dose study with three treatment periods conducted in healthy participants. The study is designed to compare the PK profiles of a single oral dose of an immediate and extended release formulation of propagermanium, and to identify if there is a food-effect on the extended release formulation. Participants who meet all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be evaluated throughout the study. In addition to PK assessments, safety and tolerability data will be collected during the course of the study. Approximately 14 participants will be enrolled into two cohorts (Cohort A and Cohort B). Participants in Cohort A will receive the immediate release (IR) formulation while fasting at Dose 1, the extended release (ER) formulation while fasting at Dose 2, and the ER formulation after a meal at Dose 3. Participants in Cohort B will receive the ER formulation while fasting at Dose 1, the IR formulation while fasting at Dose 2, and the ER formulation after a meal at Dose 3. No participant will be a member of more than one cohort. Participants will be screened from -14 days prior to dose administration. Participants will be admitted to the unit on Day -1 and will remain confined to the unit for 24 hours post-dose. On Day 1, participants will receive Dose 1 and will complete procedures as detailed in Table 3. On Days 7 and 14 participants will return to the unit and will receive Doses 2 and 3 on Days 8 and 15, respectively and will complete procedures as detailed in Table 3. Participants will return to the clinic on Day 24 for follow-up visits.
-
A randomised controlled trial of sulindac to delay premature birth in pregnancies complicated by a short cervix
Expand descriptionThis study aims to assess whether sulindac therapy (100mg TWICE daily orally for 14 days) prolongs gestation in women with a cervical length of <15 mm on transvaginal sonography between 18 and 23+6 weeks of pregnancy.
-
Testing a strength and conditioning program to prevent common manipulative technique training injuries in chiropractic students: a randomised controlled trial.
Expand descriptionOur literature search failed to reveal any strength and conditioning program for chiropractic students to prevent injury whilst learning manipulative techniques or in the first years of practice. The concept of a strength and conditioning plan with the aim of reducing the likelihood of injury is worth considering as the implementation of such a program early in a practitioner’s career could reduce the prevalence and progression of injuries. The purpose of this large-scale study to examine the effectiveness of a strength and conditioning program to prevent injuries related to manual therapy training and practice. All participants will undergo a series of baseline measures over seven days. This will include demographic information, history of musculoskeletal injury, and maximal strength of muscle groups, which will be estimated using the multiple repetition test procedure (5-10 submaximal strength test) instead of traditional one repetition maximum test (1RM). 1RM will be calculated for each of strict shoulder press (SP), bench press, seated row, Latissimus Dorsi pull down, deadlift, and back racked lunge. Participants will be instructed on correct usage of equipment prior to the testing session and given time to familiarize themselves with the equipment. A warm-up will be completed prior to testing. Thereafter, 3-5 separate single attempts will be performed. Subjects will lift a weight initially 40%-60% of the perceived 1-RM. The increments of weight are dependent upon the effort required for the lift. The weight added will become smaller as the effort to lift the weight increases. If subjects are able to perform more lifts than designated by the testing protocol, subjects are allowed a minimum of four min rest and then reassessed. Participants will be instructed to perform each exercise to acute muscular exhaustion or form fatigue. Any repetitions that are not performed with a full range of motion will be discarded. When the subject can only lift the weight five to ten times, that weight and the number of repetitions are considered to estimate the 1-RM. Grip strength dynamometry will be performed during the strength testing procedure. After completion of all baseline measures, each participant will be randomly assigned to either the intervention (n=106) or comparison (n=106) group using a random number generator. Intervention group participants will undergo a 12-week strength and conditioning program, whilst the control group will perform 30 minutes of moderate intensity walking 3 days per week. After the 12-week period, all participants will undergo the same assessments completed at the baseline.
-
A controlled trial evaluation of the Australian National University Counselling Centre's 'Get Up & Go' peer-support walking program on interpersonal suicide risk and wellbeing in students
Expand descriptionThe project has several aims: (1) To examine the effectiveness of the 'Get Up & Go' peer-support walking program compared to a waitlist control condition in contributing to decreased levels of interpersonal suicide risk, depression symptoms and psychological distress, and increased levels of social support, school membership, wellbeing, and resilience in participating students at the Australian National University (ANU). (2) To explore engagement, adherence, use, and satisfaction of the 'Get Up & Go' peer-support walking program, both quantitatively and qualitatively in the treatment group. Based on previous research, it is hypothesised that participation in the 'Get Up & Go' peer-support walking program will contribute to improvements in students levels of social connectedness and wellbeing. These may be influenced by the following variables: - Participants baseline levels of social support and connectedness to the ANU, mental health (i.e., psychological distress, depression, anxiety) and interpersonal suicide risk factors (i.e., thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness). - Dosage effects, such as frequency and duration of walking, and frequency and duration of social contact with partner - Satisfaction effects, such as perceived quality of social contact with partner and connection to the ANU community induced by the program
-
Protocol for Clinical Trial of Digitally Fabricated Ankle & Foot Orthoses for Children aged 2-8 years with a Physical Disability
Expand descriptionThis is a clinical study of 20-30 participants who will receive and wear Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) manufactured through a digital process using the three-dimensional scanning technology along with the computer-aided design and additive manufacturing technologies. The results collected from these patients will be compared against the pre-existing data of the same patient wearing AFOs made using the traditional method.
-
Safety of beta blocker in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Expand descriptionCardiovascular comorbidity is common in patients with COPD. They share cigarette smoking as an important risk factor. However, beta blockers, which are commonly used to treat cardiac diseases, are traditionally avoided in patients with COPD due to the theoretical risk of respiratory adverse events. The aims of this study are: 1. To assess the safety of commencing beta blockers during an acute exacerbation of COPD in individuals with coexistent cardiovascular disease. 2. To assess the impact of commencement of beta blockers on lung function as measure by post bronchodilator spirometry in patients admitted for exacerbation of COPD. This is a prospective interventional study of individuals admitted with exacerbations of COPD conducted in two metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne. Individuals who are admitted to the Northern and Austin Hospital with acute exacerbations of COPD who have a history of COPD (GOLD Class II – III) and of cardiovascular disease will be invited to participate in the study. When they are considered stable and suitable for participation, the treating team will notify the study coordinator who will consent and enroll the individual in the study. After signing of the informed consent form, participants who are identified to be ready for discharge the following day will perform spirometry. An initial dose of a cardio-selective beta blocker will be administered and spirometry will be repeated. Unless an adverse event has occurred, beta blocker administration will continue on the day of discharge, with spirometry repeated. Participants will be reviewed at 21-days post discharge with repeat spirometry. This will be carried out in the Respiratory Outpatient Clinic as is standard practice.
-
Optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy subjects and patients with retinal vascular diseases.
Expand descriptionOptical coherence tomography angiography is a new imaging technique for retinal and choroidal vasculature.Diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion are the most common retinal vascular diseases which lead to significant vision loss due to retinal ischemia and macular edema. Coats disease is an idiopathic retinal vascular disease characterised by telangiectasia and exudative retinopathy. In this study we do retrospective and prospective analysis of OCTA images of patients with retinal vascular diseases and a group of healthy volunteer who have undergone OCTA at Lions eye institute from 2015 to 2018 .These patients are identified through database search of all patients . Patients who have given consent for their retinal images to be used for research are eligible. The aim of the study to measure the vascular density and foveal avascular zone in patients with retinal vascular diseases and healthy volunteers. In addition, to compare the vascular density between the diseased subjects and healthy controls.
-
An adaptive clinical trial of topical, anti-inflammatory dressings on pain in adults with venous leg ulcers: Pilot study
Expand descriptionSYNOPSIS Study Title: An adaptive trial of topical anti-inflammatory agents on pain in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers: A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial - Pilot study Development Phase: IV, Pilot Study Purpose: The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an anti-inflammatory wound dressing, containing ibuprofen, on pain levels of patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. The primary hypothesis is that this ibuprofen-impregnated wound dressing will result in reduced levels of pain, in comparison to a non-medicated dressing. Indication: Pain score of 3 or more on the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) in patients with venous leg ulcers Study Therapy: Group 1- Ibuprofen impregnated foam dressing, compared to a non-medicated foam dressing. Group 2 – Activated Carbon dressing. A pragmatic adaptive multiple allocation trial design will evaluate an antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activated carbon dressing for participants who fail to respond, i.e. whose pain scores do note reduce by 3 or more on a 0-10 rating scale; to the ibuprofen dressing. Study Population: Male and female adults with chronic venous leg ulcers (present for 4 weeks or more) and who fit with the study inclusion/exclusion criteria will be recruited into the study. For this pilot study, 30 study participants will be recruited. No. Centres: Queensland University of Technology; Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital; Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital Study Design: The study has a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial design. Study Duration: Total of 4 weeks Objectives of the Study: This pilot study aims to obtain preliminary evidence on the effectiveness of two anti-inflammatory wound dressings on pain in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. A sequential, multiple allocation randomised controlled trial of an ibuprofen-impregnated foam dressing, or an activated carbon dressing for non-responders, will be compared with a non-medicated foam dressing. Study Endpoints: (Primary and Secondary) The primary outcomes of this pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial is to obtain preliminary evidence on the effectiveness of two anti-inflammatory wound dressings on pain in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. Secondary outcomes include obtaining evidence on the feasibility of the study and variation in outcome measures, to guide future applications for a fully powered trial. The primary safety endpoints will be incidence of treatment emergent adverse events with study participants assessed prior to commencing the trial and then again following every week for adverse effects.