ANZCTR search results

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), yet substantial uncertainties persist regarding its efficacy as a maintenance treatment. This prospective study seeks to investigate the efficacy of maintenance rTMS in individuals with TRD who have previously responded to an acute course of rTMS. In the R61 phase of the study, we will recruit 75 participants across three study sites, the University of California San Diego, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Australian National University, into a double-blind, three-arm maintenance treatment trial. In this trial, participants will be randomized to receive either standard maintenance rTMS, clustered maintenance rTMS, or sham maintenance rTMS for a duration of 6 months. Our primary aim is to examine the efficacy of maintenance rTMS on sustaining connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) measured through concurrent TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) at baseline and every six weeks throughout the 6-month treatment period. We will also assess changes in depressive symptom severity using clinical scales, including the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as a secondary outcome measure. It is hypothesized that stimulation with clustered maintenance rTMS will demonstrate superiority in sustaining DLPFC-SGC connectivity compared with standard maintenance rTMS and sham maintenance rTMS

This is a Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-and-multiple ascending dose study in which the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of orally administered MWN109 tablets will be assessed in healthy adult participants.

This is a Phase 1/2a double-blind dose-escalating study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single and multiple doses of ARO-ALK7 in adult participants with obesity without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) (Part 1), and the safety, tolerability and PD of multiple doses of ARO-ALK7 in adult participants with obesity with and without T2DM, either as monotherapy or in combination with tirzepatide (Part 2).

Jack Jumper ant (JJA) venom allergy is a uniquely Australian medical condition. It is the leading cause of venom allergy and affects up to three per cent of the population. 70 percent of people with JJA allergy will have another reaction on a repeat sting and this sensitivity appears to persist for many years. Venom immunotherapy (VIT) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment in the prevention of severe systemic allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) to future stings. It is currently offered to patients as standard care in Tasmania, South Australia and Victoria. However, whilst JJA VIT has been used for many years, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term benefit of the treatment and how it impacts patient quality of life. This trial will offer patients who have completed a JJA VIT program (between 3 and \< 6-years duration) and have been off-treatment for at least 18-months and \< 5 years, to have a supervised JJA sting challenge and blood test to assess their JJA venom tolerance level. It will also ask them to complete a set of questionnaires at different timepoints to obtain a history of their exposure and reactions to JJA stings outside of the hospital setting (field stings), and to measure the impact of the completed VIT and knowledge of their sting challenge outcome on their quality of life and their behaviours around auto-injectors. These measures will be used to explore the long-term effectiveness of JJA VIT and the impact of a sting challenge post VIT on a patient's quality of life.

This randomized trial compares two prescribing strategies to treat high blood pressure. One approach involves remote treatment informed by randomized trial evidence without regular monitoring of blood pressure ("fire and forget"), whilst the other involves usual care treatment with access to frequent blood pressure monitoring. The study will enrol participants with uncontrolled high blood pressure and randomize participants 1:1 to a "fire and forget" treatment group or a "more blood pressure monitoring" group for a total of 12 weeks. "Fire and forget" involves choosing the most appropriate treatment based on the highest quality evidence (randomized trial data), after which participants will stop measuring blood pressures until the end of study. The "more blood pressure monitoring" group will involve treatment as usual but with the access to frequent and high quality blood pressure monitoring. The goal of this research is to: 1. determine which prescribing approach is more effective at lowering blood pressure after 12 weeks (end of study) 2. assess the safety, feasibility and acceptability of the two treatment approaches.

In this study, researchers will learn more about the use of felzartamab in participants with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). IgAN is a kidney disease caused by the buildup of an antibody called IgA in the kidneys over time. In people with IgAN, abnormal IgA and other antibodies form clusters that build up in the small filters of the kidneys, which leads to inflammation and damage. Felzartamab is designed to target certain immune cells that produce these abnormal antibodies. This study will focus on participants who have protein in their urine (proteinuria) as a result of damaged kidneys. The main goal of the study is to learn about the effect felzartamab has on proteinuria. The main question that researchers want to answer is: • How much does the amount of protein in the urine change from the start of the study to Week 36? Researchers will learn about the effect felzartamab has on the kidneys' ability to filter blood. They will also learn more about the safety of felzartamab and how it is processed by the body. The study will be done as follows: * Participants will be screened to check if they can join the study. * Participants will be randomized to receive either felzartamab or a placebo. A placebo looks like the study drug but contains no real medicine. * Neither the researchers nor the participants will know what the participants will receive. * Participants will receive felzartamab or placebo as intravenous (IV) infusions. The treatment period will last 24 weeks. * Afterwards, participants will enter a follow-up period which will last 80 weeks. * In total, participants will have 17 study visits. Participants will stay in the study for about 2 years.

This Phase 1a/1b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluates the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of subcutaneously (SC) administered TRB-061 in healthy adults and patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). The number of dosing cohorts may be increased or decreased in Part 1 or Part 2. Part 1 (SAD): Healthy participants receiving single doses of TRB-061 or placebo. Part 2 (MAD): Healthy participants receiving multiple doses (3 doses over 8 weeks) of TRB-061 or placebo. Part 3 (Phase 1b): Participants with moderate-to-severe AD receiving repeated doses (4 doses over 12 weeks) of TRB-061 or placebo.

The main purpose of this study is to assess how well JNJ-77242113 works when compared to placebo and ustekinumab in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess initial safety/tolerability of multiple doses of drug NAV-240. It will also learn about the profile and immunogenicity of drug NAV-240. The main question it aims to answer is: • What medical problems do participants have when taking multiple doses of drug NAV-240? Researchers will compare drug NAV-240 to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if any medical problems participants have differ between those taking drug NAV-240 and those taking placebo.

This study is researching an experimental drug called linvoseltamab. The study is focused on participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (transplant-ineligible). The main purpose of this study is to compare the effect and safety of linvoseltamab with the effect and safety of the standard treatment.