ANZCTR search results

Because Propofol is the primary "anesthetic agent," and inhalational agents remain in trace quantities at the end of the procedure Sevoflurane initiated intravenous anesthesia (SIIVA) or not present at all Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) it is likely that different criteria may be predictive of extubation success in these patients compared to inhalational anesthesia.

Demonstrate the relationship between dd-cfDNA levels and HLA antibodies in blood transplant recipient and Demonstrate the Molecular Microscope® (MMDx) Diagnostic System results in indication and protocol biopsies from lung transplants.

The Presidio Medical Ultra Low Frequency (ULF™) Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System is intended to provide pain relief to participants who have been clinically diagnosed with chronic low back pain with or without leg pain.

A postoperative high-acuity model of care (ARRC) has been shown, in a prospective cohort study of approximately 850 patients, to produce a marked improvement in patient and hospital outcomes, and hospital costs, in medium risk patients (Ludbrook G et al., JAMA Surgery 2023). The goal of this observational study is to examine the outcomes after non-cardiac surgery of a larger group of medium risk patients receiving different forms of care -ARRC and usual ward care. The main questions it aims to answer are: what are the outcomes for patients and hospital after the different forms of care, who receives benefit from high acuity care, what underlies the improved outcomes seen with high acuity care.

The ASSIST study is a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of atrasentan vs. placebo in subjects with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) while on background standard of care therapy and an SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i).

The goal of this study is to understand and compare an alternative model of care in comparison to the usual model of care in include male and female participants =18 years of age with a history of ASCVD (hear and blood vessels diseases) or high-risk participants who have elevated bad cholesterol (LDL-C =1.8 mmol/L). The alternative model of care includes telephone support calls from a study nurse (after visits 1,2 and 4) and text messages to your mobile phone with healthy heart information. The main question it aims to answer is to understand and compare an alternative model of care in comparison to the usual model of care by evaluating the study participants bad cholesterol values after 180 and 365 days of the study. Each participant will take their medications as per usual care but may have the addition of Inclisiran, 284 mg 1.5 ml liquid in a single-use prefilled syringe for under skin administration. In accordance with the current medical practice guidelines for treating heart related conditions, Inclisiran and its product information will be made available for use in both care models. All the participants who decide to take part in this study will be requested to do the following: * Answer any questions from the study doctor or the study staff as accurately as possible when asked about changes in health status, medications, heart health, visits to other doctors or hospital admissions, planned surgery, even if they think none of these are related to the study. * Study doctor will be able to inform them of which medications you can and cannot take as part of this study. * To use mobile phone to receive text messages and/or questionnaires as proposed in the new model of care. * Advise the study doctor if they plan to move away from the geographical area where the study is being conducted during the study period. * Take the medications for cholesterol lowering treatment (such as a statin and/or ezetimibe) that are prescribed by the study doctor. * Tell the study doctor or study staff as soon as possible about suspected participant / participant partner pregnancy. * Tell the study doctor or study staff if they change their mind about taking part in the study. * Attend all the visits (screening visit, visits 1, 2, 3, 4 and visit 5). * Provide all the information that will enable the study team to contact them, i.e., inform the study staff if contact details change, provide contact details of a family member, etc.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and response of combining Pirtobrutinib and Glofitimab in patients with relapsed MCL. The main question it aims to answer are: * Will additive and synergistic effects be observed when using a combination of glofitamab and pirtobrutinib? * Will this combination be safe and lead to high complete- and remission rates with no residual disease? Pirtobrutinib will be given to all participants as an oral tablet for the duration of the entire study. Participants will receive other treatment in 3 phases: 1. Treatment Ramp-Up 1. Treatment with Obinutuzumab by Intravenous (IV) 2. An initial dose level of Glofitamab will evaluate step-up dosing. If excessive adverse events are observed, a lower initial dose will be used. 2. Fixed course combination phase: Treatment with Glofitamab by IV 3. Maintenance phase: Glofitamab is discontinued. 200mg oral daily

This study is researching an experimental drug called dupilumab. The study is focused on participants with active eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) with or without eosinophilic duodenitis (EoD). Participants with EoD only are not eligible for enrollment. EoG and EoD are uncommon, persistent, allergic/immune diseases in which eosinophils (a type of white blood cell) gather in large numbers in the stomach and small intestine and cause inflammation and damage. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of dupilumab on relieving EoG (with or without EoD) symptoms and reducing inflammation in the stomach and, if applicable, small intestine in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older after at least 24 weeks (about 6 months) and up to 52 weeks (1 year) of treatment. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * What side effects may happen from taking the study drug * How much study drug is in the blood at different times * Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the drug less effective or could lead to side effects)

New drug efficacy in ES has been disappointing in the last decades and no new drugs have been successfully introduced up to now in front line treatment. Among the tested drugs, early clinical data suggest that strategies using multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with anti-angiogenic activities are among the most efficient and may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with ES. Several TKI have been and are currently being tested as single-agent in patients with relapsed/refractory ES with encouraging results in phase II trials. Regorafenib has shown promising activity in Ewing sarcoma relapse setting, Nevertheless, regorafenib has never been combined with the intensive chemotherapy VDC/IE schedule and therefore this combination needs to be evaluated in order to avoid dose reduction of the current standard treatment and hence its efficacy. The current clinical trial has been therefore designed to test the feasibility of regorafenib with ES conventional chemotherapy. It consists of a phase Ib that will only recruit patients with multi-metastatic (other than lungs/pleura only) ES, that present the highest unmet medical need (2 year EFS: 33%, similar to patients with relapse/refractory ES).

This is a Phase 1, parallel, randomized, active-controlled, multi-center, dose-esclation study with a Master Protocol design which will include several substudies that are developed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different dose levels of modified messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines encoding full length hemagglutinin (HA) sequence of influenza virus encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) (hereafter referred to as HA mRNA vaccines) compared to control(s). The HA mRNA vaccine candidates and control(s) are presented in the substudy protocols. The aim is to generate clinical data across different substudies to provide learnings regarding the mRNA technology to support optimization of the mRNA platform including mRNA and LNP design and to support the decision of LNP and dose selection for future projects using mRNA technology. The purpose of this Substudy 01 is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a single IM injection of up to 5 dose levels of a monovalent modified mRNA encoding the full-length HA sequence of A/Tasmania/503/2020 (H3N2) influenza virus encapsulated in LNP (hereafter referred to as H3 mRNA /LNP) administered as a single intramuscular (IM) injection in adults 18 to 49 years of age and 60 years of age and above, compared to the following active control: a quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4).