ANZCTR search results

This study will be done to see if ziltivekimab can be used to treat people living with heart failure and inflammation. Participants will either get ziltivekimab or placebo. Participants will get study medicine for once-monthly injections either in a pre-filled syringe to inject the study medicine into a skinfold or a pen-injector to inject the study medicine into flat skin. The study is expected to last for up to 4 years. Participants will have up to 20 clinic visits. Participants will have to use a study app on their phone to record and share information about all their injections of study medicine and to fill in questionnaires.

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor activity, safety, and tolerability of tislelizumab plus investigational agent(s) with or without chemotherapy. This study is structured as a master protocol with separate sub- studies. Sub-study 1 includes participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (= 50%), and Sub-study 2 includes participants with NSCLC with low or negative (PD-L1) expression (\< 50%).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of VX-548 and its metabolite in the absence and presence of omeprazole or rifampin, in healthy participants.

This will be a single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose study in healthy adult subjects.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine and non-enteric coated aspirin, combined or alone, to improve cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.

The goal of this study is to find out if the experimental product, sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) in combination with pembrolizumab given after surgery, is effective and safe compared to the treatment of physician's choice (TPC) which includes either pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus capecitabine in participants with triple negative breast cancer that still remains after surgery and pre-surgical treatment.

The primary objective of this study is to describe the safety and tolerability of rocatinlimab in adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a switch to Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) compared with continued baseline antiretroviral therapy (ART), through Week 48; and to evaluate the antiretroviral activity of a switch to DOR/ISL compared with continued baseline ART at Week 48. The primary hypothesis is that DOR/ISL is non-inferior to continued baseline ART, as assessed by the percentage of participants with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) =50 copies/mL at Week 48, with a margin of 4 percentage points used to define non-inferiority.

This study is intended to confirm the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and the durability of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) suppression observed with bepirovirsen for 24 weeks (with loading doses) as compared to the placebo arm. This study will have 4 stages: a) Double-blind treatment (bepirovirsen or placebo) for 24 weeks. b) Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment for 24 weeks. c) NA cessation stage OR Continue NA for 24 weeks. d) Durability of response and follow up for further 24 weeks for participants who stopped NA treatment at Week 48. The arms will be stratified based on HBsAg level (HBsAg greater than or equal to \[=\] 100 international unit per milliliter \[IU/mL\] to less than or equal \[=\]1000 IU/mL or greater than \[\>\] 1000 IU/mL to =3000 IU/mL) at screening. The total duration of the study, including screening (up to 60 days), the double-blind treatment stage (24 weeks), the On NA only stage (24 weeks), and the NA cessation and durability stages (48 weeks) is up to approximately 104 weeks at maximum for each participant.

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the antiretroviral activity of a switch to Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) compared with continued Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) at Week 48; and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a switch to DOR/ISL compared with continued BIC/FTC/TAF, through Week 48. The primary hypotheses are that (1) DOR/ISL is non-inferior to continued BIC/FTC/TAF, as assessed by the percentage of participants with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) =50 copies/mL at Week 48, with a margin of 4 percentage points used to define non-inferiority; and (2) DOR/ISL is superior to BIC/FTC/TAF, as assessed by the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA =50 copies/mL at Week 48.