ANZCTR search results

These search results are from the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR).

You can narrow down the results using the filters

33027 results sorted by trial registration date.
  • Improving Early Intervention in Hearing Impaired Children Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS)

    The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether hearing test results using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) will help to fast-track early intervention for infants born with a hearing loss. fNIRS is a method of imaging brain activity using light. The main questions are: 1. Can audiologists make more confident decisions about the optimal interventions at different critical points in the hearing care pathway when they are given additional fNIRS information compared to when they have standard audiology test results alone? 2. Is the experience of their infant having an fNIRS test acceptable and comfortable for the parents or care givers?

  • Clairleaf??: A Study to Test Long-term Treatment With BI 1291583 in People With Bronchiectasis Who Took Part in a Previous Study With This Medicine

  • Mobile App-delivered Sleep Therapy (SleepFix) for Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain and Insomnia

    The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of a digital behavioral therapy for insomnia (dBTi) in people with chronic low back pain and insomnia. The main question it aims to answer is whether a 3 week period of dBTi can improve pain-related interference 6 weeks from commencement. Researchers will compare the treatment (dBTi) to an active control (Sleep health education modules) to see if there is a significant difference in outcomes at baseline and end-of-study (6 weeks).

  • A Study of BRII-297 in Healthy Adult Subjects

    The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of BRII-297 in healthy adult subjects. The main aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability after single dose intramuscular administration of BRII-297. The study also aims at characterizing the PK profiles of BRII-297 and brexanolone after single dose intramuscular administration. Participants will be enrolled in 6 cohorts (3 planned and 3 optional) with 6 participants per cohort \[(4 active: 2 placebo) - Cohorts 1 \& 2\] and 10 participants per cohort \[(8 active: 2 placebo) - Cohorts 3 to 6\]. Randomization for each cohort will be a two-step process. Sentinel subjects for each cohort will include 2 female subjects randomized 1:1 to BRII-297 or placebo who will be observed for at least 24 hours to ensure no significant safety events before administering study drug to the remaining non-sentinel subjects. The estimated total duration for each subject is up to 43 days, including screening period (28 days), dosing period (1 day), and post-dose follow-up period (14 days). IM injections will be administered in the gluteal muscle. Each participant in all cohorts will begin their inpatient stay at the clinical investigational site on Day -1 and remain as an inpatient at the site for sample collection and assessments for 15 days post dose (Day 15). Participants will be released at the end of the inpatient period.

  • A Study of Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Plus Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) +/- Investigational Agents in First-Line Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (mUC) (MK-3475-04B/KEYMAKER-U04)

    This study is a substudy being conducted under one pembrolizumab umbrella master study KEYMAKER-U04. The substudy will consist of 2 parts. Part 1 will evaluate the efficacy and safety of coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab plus EV and coformulated vibostolimab/pembrolizumab plus EV relative to pembrolizumab plus EV. There will be no comparison of coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab plus EV versus coformulated vibostolimab/pembrolizumab plus EV. If ORR and/or DRR are substantially better on coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab plus EV and/or coformulated vibostolimab/pembrolizumab plus EV compared with pembrolizumab plus EV, after evaluation of the totality of data, the sponsor might consider Part 2 (expansion) to further characterize the efficacy and safety of the treatment arms under study.

  • Evaluation of Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Vanzacaftor/Tezacaftor/Deutivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis Participants 1 Year of Age and Older

    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor (VNZ/TEZ/D-IVA) in participants with cystic fibrosis (CF).

  • A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of ILB-202

    This is a Phase I, Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of ILB-202 Administered Intravenously as Single Ascending Doses to Healthy Participants. Male or female subjects aged 18 to 50 years (inclusive) who fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled in this study.

  • Program to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity of Oral Upadacitinib in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an immune-mediated disease associated with inflammation of multiple organ systems. This study will assess how safe and effective upadacitinib is in treating adult participants with moderately to severely active SLE. Adverse events and change in the disease activity will be assessed. Upadacitinib is an approved drug for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondylarthritis and is being developed for the treatment of SLE. This study is "double-blinded", which means that neither the trial participants nor the study doctors will know who will be given upadacitinib and who will be given placebo (does not contain treatment drug) . This study comprised of 4 sub studies. In Study 1 and Study 2, study doctors put the participants in 1 of the 2 groups, called treatment arms. Each group receives a different treatment. There is a 1 in 2 chance that participants will be assigned to placebo. Eligible participants from Study 1 and Study 2 will enter Study 3 at week 52 to receive specific doses of upadacitinib. Study 4 is a 104-week continued extension if participation is likely to provide a benefit to their SLE. Approximately 500 participants diagnosed with SLE will be enrolled in each of the Study 1 and Study 2 in approximately 320 sites across the world. Participants will receive oral tablets of upadacitinib or matching placebo once daily for 52 weeks in Study 1 and Study 2. Eligible participants from Study 1 and Study 2 will receive oral tablets of upadacitinib once daily for 52 weeks in Study 3. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

  • Study of Ribociclib and Everolimus in HGG and DIPG or Ribociclib and Temozolomide in DHG, H3G34-mutant

    The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of the 1) ribociclib and everolimus to treat pediatric and young adult patients newly diagnosed with a high-grade glioma (HGG), including DIPG, that have genetic changes in pathways (cell cycle, PI3K/mTOR) that these drugs target or 2) ribociclib and temozolomide to treat pediatric and young adult patients newly diagnosed with diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG), H3G34-mutant. The main question the study aims to answer is whether the combinations of ribociclib and everolimus or ribociclib and temozolomide can prolong the life of patients diagnosed with HGG/DIPG or DHG H3G34-mutant.

  • Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Patients With Hormone Receptor-positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative (HR+/HER2-) Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Received Endocrine Therapy

    The goal of this clinical study is to see if sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) can improve life spans of people with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer and their tumor does not grow or spread when compared to currently available standard treatments, such as paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel or capecitabine. The primary objective is to compare the effect of SG relative to the treatment of physician's choice (TPC) on progression-free survival (PFS).

Tags:
  • Finding clinical trials