ANZCTR search results

The purpose of this study is to assess how well a new scoring system called the 5-SENSE score can predict where seizures start in the brain using Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). The 5-SENSE Score is a 5-point score based on routine presurgical work-up, designed to assist in predicting whether SEEG can identify a focal seizure onset zone, thereby sparing patients the risk of undergoing this invasive diagnostic procedure.

This is a phase 1/2a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple ascending doses of SRP-1003 compared to placebo in male and female participants with type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1). Participants who have provided written informed consent and met all protocol eligibility requirements will be randomized to receive single (Part 1) or multiple (Part 2) doses of SRP-1003 or placebo.

The purpose of the study is to learn how the study medicine called PF-07868489 is tolerated and acts in healthy adult people and people with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Part A: An investigator- and participant-blind, sponsor-open, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of PF-07868489 in healthy adult participants. Part B: A 24-week, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety, tolerability, PK, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of PF-07868489 in adult participants with PAH.

This study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy following oral administration of AZD3470 as a monotherapy, and in combination with other anticancer agents in participants with haematologic malignancies.

This is a Phase 1/2, global multicentre, open-label, single-arm, dose escalation and dose optimization study of surovatamig (AZD0486) to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of surovatamig (AZD0486) monotherapy in participants with R/R B ALL. The study will consist of 4 parts. Part A: monotherapy dose escalation in 3L+ B-ALL. Part B: dose optimization in 3L+ B-ALL. Part C: Dose expansion in 3L+ B-ALL. Part D: Dose optimization and efficacy expansion in R/R B-ALL (2L+)

This study will assess the safety and immunogenicity of a fourth dose (booster) of BNT162b2 when coadministered with SIIV compared to separate administration of the vaccines when given 1 month apart (SIIV followed by BNT162b2), in participants who have received 3 prior doses of 30 µg BNT162b2, with the third dose being at least 90 days before Visit 1 (Day 1). * Healthy adults 18 through 64 years of age will be randomized 1:1 to either the co-administration group, or the separate administration group * The duration of the study for each participant will be approximately 2 months * There are 3 scheduled study visits each about 1 month apart * The study will be conducted in New Zealand and Australia.

RT-310, a novel implant, is intended to minimally invasive treat locally the prostate gland for the management of prostate disease, while minimizing side-effects. The objectives of the study are to assess whether RT-310 is safe and feasible for the participant population.

This is an interventional, randomized, parallel group, treatment, Phase IIb, double blind, 4-arm study to assess the effect of pegylated-recombinant-human interleukin-2 (rezpegaldesleukin) in adult participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The estimated duration is 15-35 days for screening, an Induction Period of 16 weeks, a Maintenance Period from Week 16-Week 52, and a Posttreatment Follow-Up Period for an additional year up to approximately Week 104 for all patients. Patients with a response at Week 16 (end of induction therapy) will be re-randomized for the maintenance therapy period.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of opevesostat plus daily corticosteroids compared to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in participants with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with one next-generation hormonal agent (NHA). The primary study hypothesis is that opevesostat is superior to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide with respect to radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), in androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) mutation positive and negative participants.

This is a phase 3, randomized, open-label study of opevesostat compared to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with respect to overall survival (OS) in participants with mCRPC previously treated with next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) and taxane-based chemotherapy. It is hypothesized that opevesostat is superior with respect to OS in androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) mutation-negative and -positive participants.