ANZCTR search results

A functioning vascular access provides a lifeline for patients requiring haemodialysis but vascular access dysfunction remains one of the leading causes of excessive morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs in this group. Despite increasing numbers of vascular access trials, successful interventions to improve vascular access function have been sparse and compromised by highly variable, often selectively reported outcome measures of limited relevance to patients and health professionals. Through engagement of all relevant stakeholders including patients and caregivers, vascular access function, defined by the need for interventions to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis, has been identified as one of the most critically important outcome measures for trials in haemodialysis. This prospective, multi-centre, multinational validation study aims to assess the accuracy and feasibility of measuring vascular access function part of routine clinical practice and across different clinical settings to ensure successful global implementation of this core outcome measure in future trials in haemodialysis.

The study is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, Phase 3 clinical trial with the primary objective of demonstrating the efficacy of palbociclib in combination with Endocrine therapy over Endocrine therapy alone measured by PEPI and EndoPredict™ EPclin Score in women with operable HR+, HER2 negative breast cancer . The Clinical Response Rate, drop in Ki67 index = 2.7% and Breast conserving rate will be compared between two arms.

The primary objective of the study is to compare disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) treated with adjuvant cemiplimab, versus those treated with placebo, after surgery and radiation therapy (RT). The secondary objectives of the study are: * To compare the overall survival (OS) of high-risk CSCC patients treated with adjuvant cemiplimab, versus those treated with placebo, after surgery and RT * To compare the effect of adjuvant cemiplimab with that of placebo on patients' freedom from locoregional recurrence (FFLRR) after surgery and RT * To compare the effect of adjuvant cemiplimab with that of placebo on patients' freedom from distant recurrence (FFDR) after surgery and RT * To compare the effect of adjuvant cemiplimab with that of placebo on the cumulative incidence of second primary CSCC tumors (SPTs) after surgery and RT * To evaluate the safety of adjuvant cemiplimab and that of placebo in high-risk CSCC patients after surgery and RT * To assess cemiplimab pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity in human serum

Multinational, investigator-initiated study of oral anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events in patients with transient atrial fibrillation occurring transiently with stress and additional stroke risk factors.

The goal of this clinical study is to learn more about the study drug, sacituzumab govitecan-hziy, in participants with metastatic (cancer that has spread) solid tumors.

This study has 2 parts. The first part of the study is done. The first part was open to adults with different types of advanced cancer (solid tumors). The second part is open to people with specific types of soft tissue sarcoma, advanced lung cancer, and cancer in the stomach, bladder or bile ducts. The participants get a combination of 2 medicines called brigimadlin (also called BI 907828) and ezabenlimab (also called BI 754091). Brigimadlin is a so-called MDM2 inhibitor that is being developed to treat cancer. Ezabenlimab is an antibody that may help the immune system fight cancer (immune checkpoint inhibitor). When the study started, some participants got a third medicine called BI 754111 in addition. Treatment with BI 754111 was stopped because data from another study showed no additional effect of BI 754111. The purpose of the first part of the study was to find out the highest dose of brigimadlin that the participants could tolerate in combination with ezabenlimab. This dose is used in the second part of the study. The purpose of the second part is to see whether the combination of brigimadlin with ezabenlimab is able to make tumors shrink. The participants are in the study as long as they benefit from treatment and can tolerate it. Ezabenlimab treatment is limited to 2 years. During this time, they get infusions of ezabenlimab, and take tablets with brigimadlin every 3 weeks. The doctors check how many participants have health problems during the study. The doctors also monitor the size of the tumor.

This is a 52 week Phase 2b study designed to evaluate the efficacy at 16 weeks and to evaluate the safety and efficacy up to 1 year in subjects with active psoriatic arthritis.

The objective of this study was to collect data both retrospectively and prospectively in order to evaluate the long-term outcomes, durability of effect, and real-world treatment patterns following treatment with Cladribine Tablets or placebo in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were previously participated in the parent studies (ORACLE MS and CLARITY/CLARITY-EXT).

This is a phase I/II study to evaluate the feasibility, safety and preliminary antitumor efficacy of rapcabtagene autoleucel (also known as YTB323). Rapcabtagene autoleucel will be investigated in combination with ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and as single agent in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (3L+ DLBCL), adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 1st Line High Risk Large B-Cell Lymphoma (1L HR LBCL).

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Itraconazole Administered as a Dry Powder for Inhalation (PUR1900) in Adult Asthmatic Patients With Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis