ANZCTR search results

Background: Effectiveness of maintenance therapy for COPD with Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) requires an optimal Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate (PIFR), a proper inhalation technique and adequate medication adherence from patients. Recent studies have suggested that patients with reduced peak inspiratory flow may have worse COPD-related symptom burden and increased risk of COPD-related hospitalizations. However, in primary care, little is known about how many COPD patients have suboptimal PIFR. Furthermore, there is a paucity of knowledge concerning the associations of PIFR, inhalation technique and medication adherence with the effectiveness of maintenance therapy. Objective: To examine associations of PIFR, inhalation technique, and medication adherence with health status and disease, exacerbations, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with COPD receiving maintenance treatment with dry powder inhalers. Study design: Cross-sectional observational study in five European countries\*. Study population: COPD patients aged 40 years or older who have received COPD maintenance therapy through DPIs in the past 3 months or longer. Main study parameters: Health status as measured with the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), number of exacerbations, an assessment of PIFR, inhalation technique errors, medication adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), medication use and demographic and clinical covariates. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: No significant burden from participating is expected. Risk of participating is deemed negligible. In addition, patients may benefit from participating. Specifically, patients who manifest inhalation errors, will receive a tailored inhalation instruction to remediate their inhalation errors. The impact of this instruction will not be evaluated in any way, therefore it should not be seen as an intervention. \* If the preplanned number of patients cannot be included also because of national outbreaks of SARS-COV-2 resulting in travel restrictions, participation will be sought from researchers from three other European countries

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and tolerability of BGB-DXP593 administered intravenously as a single dose in healthy participants

The main aim of the study is to assess if TAK-101 can reduce gluten related symptoms and immune activation in adult participants with celiac disease (CeD) on a gluten-free diet (GFD). Participants will receive TAK-101 and/or placebo through the vein on Day 1 and Day 8. All participants will receive active treatment at Week 24.

This is a non-randomized open-label extension study for subjects having completed protocol DA071976 or CLN100P.01.

The objective of this prospective, multi-center trial is to assess the effectiveness of the CARILLON Mitral Contour System in treating patients with moderate-to-severe atrial functional mitral regurgitation (aFMR)

Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study assessing the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib plus rituximab,cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) vs placebo plus R-CHOP in subjects =75 years of age with previously untreated non-germinal center diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the ACRYSOF® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) when implanted in the eye following cataract removal in an Asian population.

The primary objective of this study is to assess overall survival (OS) with sacituzumab govitecan-hziy in comparison with treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in participants with metastatic or locally advanced unresectable urothelial cancer (UC).

This is an open-label, randomized, multi-site, Phase II, interventional trial designed to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BNT111 + cemiplimab in anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-refractory/relapsed patients with unresectable Stage III or IV melanoma. The contributions of BNT111 and cemiplimab will be delineated in single agent calibrator arms. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to Arm 1 (BNT111 + cemiplimab) and calibrator Arm 2 (BNT111 monotherapy), and Arm 3 (cemiplimab monotherapy). Patients in single agent calibrator arms (Arms 2 and 3), who experience centrally verified disease progression under single agent treatment, may be offered addition of the other compound to the ongoing treatment after re-consent.

This study is designed to evaluate the discontinuation/re-treatment of pexidartinib therapy in previously treated participants with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT).