ANZCTR search results

Premature babies often need help immediately after birth to open their lungs to air, start breathing and keep their hearts beating. Opening their lungs can be difficult, and once open the under-developed lungs of premature babies will often collapse again between each breath. To prevent this nearly all premature babies receive some form of mechanical respiratory support to aid breathing. Common to all types of respiratory support is the delivery of a treatment called positive end-expiratory pressure, or PEEP. PEEP gives air, or a mixture of air and oxygen, to the lung between each breath to keep the lungs open and stop them collapsing. Currently, clinicians do not have enough evidence on the right amount, or level, of PEEP to give at birth. As a result, doctors around the world give different amounts (or levels) of PEEP to premature babies at birth. In this study, the Investigators will look at 2 different approaches to PEEP to help premature babies during their first breaths at birth. At the moment, the Investigators do not know if one is better than the other. One is to give the same PEEP level to the lungs. The others is to give a high PEEP level at birth when the lungs are hardest to open and then decrease the PEEP later once the lungs are opened and the baby is breathing. Very premature babies have a risk of long-term lung disease (chronic lung disease). The more breathing support a premature baby needs, the more likely the risk of developing chronic lung disease. The Investigators want to find out whether one method of opening the baby's lungs at birth results in them needing less breathing support. This research has been initiated by a group of doctors from Australia, the Netherlands and the USA, all who look after premature babies.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pamrevlumab versus placebo in combination with systemic corticosteroids in participants with non-ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy (age 12 years and older).

The study will determine Recommended Phase 2 Dose for all study drugs, based on the safety and tolerability of the following combinations: INCAGN02385 + INCAGN02390 and INCAGN02385 + INCAGN02390 + INCMGA00012.

The JETi Registry is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center study to collect real-world data on the safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the JETi™ Hydrodynamic Thrombectomy System (JETi System) for the treatment of acute/subacute thrombosis in the peripheral vasculature. This post-market study will register approximately 280 subjects at approximately 30 centers Globally. Subjects participating in this Registry will be followed through their 12-month follow up visit.

This is a Phase 1/2a, open-label, study to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of intratumoral T3011 given alone and in combination with intravenous pembrolizumab in partients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

This is integrated Phase 1, Single centre, Randomized study will be conducted in 3 parts, each with a specific primary objective: Part A: To characterise the safety and tolerability of TTYP01 in healthy adult subjects; Part B: To evaluate the bioavailability of TTYP01 tablets in healthy adult subjects; Part C: To characterise the food effect of TTYP01 tablets in healthy adult subjects under the fasted or fed condition. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of TTYP01 tablets in healthy adult subjects, and the effects of gender on the PK of TTYP01 tablets in healthy adults. In Part A of the study, a total of 32 healthy adult subjects will be enrolled over four consecutive cohorts (8 per cohort), with participants receiving a single dose of TTYP01 at one of four levels (60, 120, 10 or 240 mg), to assess the PK and safety of TTYP01. In Part B, 16 healthy adults will be randomized into 2 groups, and the comparison of the PK of edaravone (TTYP01 and intravenous (IV) edaravone) will be evaluated using a randomized, open-label, four-period crossover design under fasted conditions. In the first crossover period, subjects will receive a single fixed dose of TTYP01 followed by the alternate IV dose after completion of the washout phase, and in the second crossover period, subjects will receive a higher fixed dose of TTYP01 followed by the alternate IV dose after completion of the washout phase. In Part C, 18 healthy subjects will be enrolled to evaluate the effect of food on the PK of TTYP01 using a randomized, open-label, two-period cross-over design. Participants will be randomized into two groups and administered a fixed dose of TTYP01 on Day 1 (Period 1) under the fed conditions and the second dosing day (Period 2) under the fasted conditions, while the other group being administered a fixed dose of TTYP01 on Day 1 (Period 1) under the fasted conditions and the second dosing day (Period 2) under the fed conditions.

C3731003 is a pivotal Phase 3 study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a single IV infusion of PF-07055480 / giroctocogene fitelparvovec (Recombinant AAV2/6 Human Factor VIII Gene Therapy) in adult male participants with moderately severe or severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C=1%) for the study duration of 5 years. The study will enroll eligible participants who have been followed on routine prophylaxis with FVIII products in the Lead-In study C0371004.

2019nCoV-101 is a 2-part, randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 1/2 trial. Part 1 (Phase 1) of the study is designed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 rS nanoparticle vaccine with or without Matrix-M adjuvant in 131 healthy participants = 18 to 59 (inclusive) years of age at 2 sites in Australia. An interim analysis of Part 1 safety and immunogenicity will be performed prior to optional expansion to Part 2. Part 2 (Phase 2) of the study is designed to evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a single construct of SARS-CoV-2 rS nanoparticle vaccine with Matrix-M adjuvant in up to 1,500 healthy participants = 18 to 84 (inclusive) years of age at up to 40 sites across Australia and/or the United States.

This study aims at investigating handwashing behavior during COVID-19 pandemic. It was hypothesized that social-cognitive and emotional predictors as well as COVID-19 morbidity and mortality rates within the country would be associated with handwashing behavior in the general population of adults in 14 countries.

This seamless, adaptive, two-stage, Phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-groups, placebo-controlled study will assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belapectin compared with placebo in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and clinical signs of portal hypertension but without esophageal varices at baseline.