ANZCTR search results

The study will be a double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-dose assessment of IV-administered GC4711 compared to GC4419 in healthy volunteers. Consenting subjects will undergo screening procedures within 28 days of the start of dosing. Pharmacokinetics (parent drug and major metabolites) will be assessed in plasma and urine from all subjects. Initially, a sentinel cohort of 4 subjects, will be enrolled; each eligible subject will receive single dose of GC4711 IV at dose of 30 mg over one hour. Following a clinical safety review by the Galera study team , if no safety concerns are identified after the last subject completes study participation, enrollment will continue in 2 stages to a crossover study design. In stage 1, 12 subjects will be enrolled and in stage 2, if no safety concerns are identified in stage 1 following a clinical safety review by the Galera study team, 20 subjects will be enrolled. In both enrollment stages, eligible subjects in the crossover design will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment sequences: Test (GC4711) -\> Ref (GC4419) or Ref (GC4419) -\> Test (GC4711). On Day 1, subjects will receive the first treatment they were randomized to, and on Day 4 (following a washout), they will receive the second treatment. Subjects will be followed up for 2 days after the second treatment.

To assess the safety and effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in patients with a failing mitral bioprosthetic valve.

INTERLIVER is a prospective observational study of the relationship of the molecular phenotype of 300 liver transplant biopsies to the histologic phenotype and the clinical features and outcomes. A segment of a biopsy performed as standard-of-care for indications, or by center protocol, will be used for gene expression study.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of abatacept with steroid treatment in comparison to steroid treatment alone in up to a 28 week taper of steroid treatment to sustain remission of Giant Cell Arteritis in adults.

Primary Objectives: Dose escalation (Part 1) Part 1A (SAR439459 monotherapy) * To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or maximum administered dose (MAD) of SAR439459 when administered intravenously as monotherapy in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Part 1B (SAR439459 and cemiplimab combination therapy) * To determine the MTD and/or MAD of SAR439459 administered intravenously in combination with cemiplimab administered intravenously in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Dose expansion (Part 2) Part 2A (SAR439459 monotherapy) * To determine optimal dose of SAR439459 administered intravenously in adult patients with advanced melanoma who have failed a prior therapy based on anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death-1) or anti-PD-L1. Part 2B (SAR439459 and cemiplimab combination therapy) * To determine the objective response rate (ORR) of SAR439459 in combination with cemiplimab in adult patients with selected advanced solid tumors by evaluation of antitumor response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Secondary Objectives: * Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile SAR439459 monotherapy and combined with cemiplimab, PK profile of cemiplimab combined with SAR439459. * Immunogenicity of SAR439459 monotherapy and combined with cemiplimab. Dose escalation (Part 1) * Overall safety/tolerability profile of SAR439459 monotherapy and combined with cemiplimab. * Preliminary recommended phase 2 dose (pRP2D) of SAR439459 as monotherapy or combined with cemiplimab. Dose expansion (Part 2) * Progression free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), ORR, and safety of SAR439459 as monotherapy and PFS, TTP, duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety in combination with cemiplimab. * To confirm the optimal dose of SAR439459 administered in combination with cemiplimab.

This trial will test the feasibility of various imaging devices to detect local skin inflammation prior to clinical manifestation.

This is a phase IIIb, single arm, open-label, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of emicizumab in participants with congenital hemophilia A who have documented inhibitors against Factor VIII (FVIII) at enrollment. Approximately 200 participants, aged 12 or older, will be enrolled in this study and are expected to be enrolled at approximately 85 sites globally. Participants will receive an initial weekly dose of prophylactic emicizumab subcutaneously for 4 weeks, followed by a weekly maintenance dose subcutaneously for the remainder of the 2-year treatment period.

SPOCS is an international, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study with bi-annual study visits over a 3-year follow-up designed to systematically describe the comprehensive SLE patient-journey regarding clinical features, disease progression and treatment patterns, SLE outcomes, health status assessments (PROs), and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in a general population of moderate-to-severe SLE patients.

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus placebo plus SOC chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU as first-line treatment in participants with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal carcinoma. The overall primary efficacy hypotheses are as follows: 1. In participants with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), participants whose tumors are programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive (defined as combined positive score \[CPS\] =10), ESCC participants whose tumors are PD-L1 positive (CPS =10), and in all participants, overall survival (OS) is superior with pembrolizumab plus SOC chemotherapy compared with placebo plus SOC chemotherapy. 2. In participants with ESCC, participants whose tumors are PD-L1 positive (CPS =10), and in all participants, progression-free survival (PFS) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 as assessed by investigator is superior with pembrolizumab plus SOC chemotherapy compared with placebo plus SOC chemotherapy.

The current study combines two treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), oral appliances and supplemental inspired oxygen. The following aims will be tested: Aim 1. To determine whether supplemental inspired oxygen further reduces OSA severity (apnea-hypopnea index) in patients using an oral appliance. Aim 2. To determine whether baseline OSA phenotypes can predict the efficacy of oral appliances versus supplemental oxygen versus both treatments in combination. We will test whether responders to oral appliances have distinct pathophysiological characteristics compared with oxygen responders.