ANZCTR search results

This Phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled treat-through study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction and maintenance therapy with Afimkibart (also known as RO7790121) in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD).

This is a phase 1/2, dose-escalation and cohort-expansion clinical study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of DT-7012 (an anti-CCR8 monoclonal antibody) as a single agent and in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in adult participants with selected advanced solid tumors.

This research is about whether treatment with a commonly used antibiotic can prevent infections in airway and lungs and improves the chance of surviving, if it is given soon after patients commence mechanical ventilation when they have been admitted to hospital with an acute severe brain injury. An acute severe brain injury can occur as a result of a stroke, a traumatic injury or due to lack of oxygen to the brain that happens as a result of a cardiac arrest. Patients who are unconscious after an acute severe brain injury often need assistance to breath adequately, and this assistance is given by a breathing tube, connected to a mechanical ventilator. This treatment is an emergency medical treatment. The breathing tube is inserted into the patients' airway by either their mouth or neck. For patients who need assistance with their breathing from a mechanical ventilator, infections in the airways and lungs, known as pneumonia, are a common complication. Everyone naturally has bacteria in their mouth, esophagus and stomach. Clinicians think that during the process of inserting the breathing tube, small amounts of these bacteria can be introduced into the airways and lung when people are unconscious following an acute severe brain injury, or during the process of placing the breathing tube into the airways. These bacteria are now in a place they aren't meant to be and can cause an infections in the airways and lungs known as pneumonia. The purpose of this research is to see if giving one dose of a common antibiotic can prevent patients developing pneumonia, which is associated with having a breathing tube inserted and being on a ventilator, improving the chance of recovery following the acute severe brain injury and ultimately improving the chance of surviving. When patients have a known infection, current guidelines are to treat them with antibiotics. Antibiotics work to kill the bacteria causing the infection. When a patient has an infection in their lungs, they often need to stay on the mechanical ventilator for longer. While current practice is to give patients with a proven infection in their airways and lungs (pneumonia) antibiotics, it is unknown if giving an antibiotic to patients to prevent these infections before they show signs of pneumonia may lead to better outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary antitumor activity of ORIC-114 in combination with subcutaneous (SC) amivantamab in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring an EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation.

The study aims to establish the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), relevant biomarkers, pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of the intravesical administration of eciskafusp alfa in combination with BCG in participants with BCG-unresponsive high-risk NMIBC. The study plans a similar evaluation of eciskafusp alfa in monotherapy following a positive interim analysis of the combination therapy.

This is a multi-centre, two-part, open-label, phase 1, first in human study of multiple ascending doses of RC220 bisantrene formulation alone and in combination with fixed dose doxorubicin to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) in adult patients with advanced solid tumours where an anthracycline may be considered as a treatment option / or is indicated. The study will consist of Part 1 - dose-escalation, to determine the maximum tolerated combination dose of RC220 with doxorubicin to be evaluated in Part 2 - dose-expansion cohort, in patients with solid tumours that are anthracycline treatment naïve and for whom treatment with doxorubicin is indicated. The objective of Part 2 will be to confirm the safety and tolerability and evaluate the preliminary cardioprotective and anti-tumour efficacy of the maximum tolerated combined dose (MTCD) of RC220 with doxorubicin.

Co-STAR is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, Bayesian Optimal Phase 2 (BOP2) trial that aims to assess the safety and efficacy of adjunctive intravenous TBO-309 in Acute Ischaemic Stroke (AIS) patients with tandem occlusion receiving intra-cranial endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and acute extracranial carotid artery stenting. Co-STARS study will test the hypothesis that patients with tandem occlusion treated with EVT and acute stenting in conjunction with TBO-309 will: * have persistent stent patency without requiring rescue therapy with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and * not experience high rates of symptomatic intra-cranial haemorrhage (sICH). Patients with tandem occlusion undergoing EVT and acute stenting will receive intravenous TBO-309 bolus and infusion. TBO-309 is a potent, selective and ATP competitive PI3K\[beta\] inhibitor which reduces platelet activation adhesion/aggregation particularly under conditions of disturbed blood flow and promotes platelet disaggregation. By targeting PI3K\[beta\], TBO-309 specifically inhibits thrombosis whilst minimizing the impact on normal hemostasis.

After a heart event or procedure, patients are encouraged to participate in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program to improve their health and reduce the risk of future problems. These programs have been shown to improve heart health and reduce hospital readmissions and deaths. However, many patients face challenges attending in-person CR programs, particularly those residing in regional or remote areas. As a result, many patients worldwide do not participate in CR. Missing out on CR increases the risk of unplanned hospital visits. To overcome these challenges, digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation programs provide an alternative. These programs use technology, such as mobile apps and telehealth, to deliver care remotely. Although these programs have the potential to make CR more accessible, there is still limited evidence about how well they work in real-world settings, including their impact on hospital visits and overall healthcare use. Therefore, the goal of this real-world observational study is to evaluate if a digitally enabled and remotely delivered cardiac rehabilitation (DeCR) program, called Heart Health at Home, can improve risk factors and hospital utilization in adults who have experienced a heart event or undergone a heart procedure. The questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the DeCR intervention group have associated reductions in hospital readmissions, total hospital bed days, and mortality compared to the usual care group? 2. Do DeCR intervention patients have similar hospital utilization outcomes compared to traditional face-to-face cardiac rehabilitation patients? 3. Does the DeCR intervention have associated improvements in healthy lifestyle behaviors and clinical risk factors? 4. Does the DeCR intervention increase uptake and engagement to cardiac rehabilitation and what are participants' and cardiac nurses' experiences and perceptions of the program? 5. Is the DeCR intervention cost effective? Researchers will compare participants receiving the DeCR intervention to those receiving traditional face-to-face cardiac rehabilitation and usual care to see if the program leads to better health outcomes and reduced healthcare utilization. Participants will participate in an 8-week DeCR intervention entailing telehealth consultations with a cardiac rehabilitation nurse and they will use a mobile app, called SmartCR, to access education, remote monitoring and progress tracking.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if UDP-003 is safe in healthy human participants and patients, assess the pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) of UDP-003 in healthy human participants and patients and its potential efficacy in patients. Researchers will compare UDP-003 to a placebo in a blinded manner. This first in human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective, single-centre trial with a modular dose-finding design will be conducted in 3 parts: * Part 1: 6 cohorts of 6 healthy participants receiving Single Ascending Doses (SADs), * Part 2: 3 cohorts of 12 healthy participants receiving Multiple Ascending Doses (MADs) (6 doses over 16 days), * Part 3: 1 cohort of 12 participants diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS; non-ST elevation myocardial infarction \[NSTEMI\] or unstable angina) at least 12 months post-event receiving multiple doses (6 administrations of the 25 mg/kg dose over 16 days). The planned duration of the study for each participant will be: * 4 weeks for SAD Participants (1-day treatment period, 4-week safety follow-up) * 6 weeks for MAD Participants (16-day treatment period,4-week safety follow-up) * 28 weeks for MD Patients (16-day treatment period, 6-month safety follow-up) Prior to participants being randomised to panels of increasing doses, all safety data will be reviewed for completed panels.

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter, double-blind Phase 2a, 2-arm study. The goal of this Phase 2a study is to assess safety and efficacy of SAR442970 in comparison to placebo to preserve ß-cell function in participants with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes (T1D) on insulin therapy. The study design comprises 2 parts: in Part A adult participants (18 to 35 years of age at screening) and in Part B adolescent and young adult participants (age range 12 to 21 years) will be randomized into SAR442970 and placebo groups. Approximately 84 participants will be included with randomization ratio 3:1 (active:placebo). The study includes a screening period (3 to 5 weeks), a double-blind treatment period of 52 weeks and a safety follow-up of 26 weeks.