ANZCTR search results

In this project, researchers are exploring different ways to support the wellbeing and relationships of families with young children (0-12 years). People in regional and rural communities often live with the threat of bushfires, floods, drought, severe storms, and other extreme weather events. Some families have been affected by these disasters and are still trying to recover. Researchers will test two different ways of supporting families in regional and rural Victoria: Family Foundations (FF): An 8-session program to promote parent wellbeing, parenting partnerships, and communication. All parents/caregivers/parenting partners in the family participate in sessions delivered by a health professional online. Family Life Check-In: A brief 30-minute telephone call with a health professional to discuss family wellbeing and relationships, and identify any supports needed. The goal of this trial is to learn whether FF works to reduce mental health difficulties for regional and rural families. The main question it aims to answer is: Compared to Family Life Check-In, does Family Foundations lead to fewer mental health difficulties? Participants will: Complete an online survey before randomisation, after they have received FF or Family Life Check-In, and six months after starting the project. Take part in either Family Foundations or Family Life Check-In.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daily administration of vosoritide in participants with HCH aged 0 to \< 36 months over a 52-week period.

This is a Phase I/II open-label, global multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZD4512 monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agent(s), in participants with Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL).

This Pfizer-sponsored real-world retrospective non-interventional study will be conducted within a research network comprised of independent hospitals across Australia using data collected during routine standard of care clinical encounters available in health records, supplemented with information from the official national immunisation registry, the Australian Immunisation Register. Additional data from accredited pathology laboratories will be included. There will be no active enrollment of study participants, no direct contact with study participants, and no collection of any primary data outside of the standard of care. This study will use a test negative design to evaluate real-world vaccine effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccination during pregnancy against RSV-associated outcomes in infants.

This study aims to evaluate the safety of the CAROL device for treating lung tumors in patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumor size = 2 cm (cT1b). The primary objective is to assess safety by monitoring and grading adverse events using the CTCAE v5.0 criteria at one month following the procedure.

A phase 1 study of 68Ga-R11228 and 177Lu-R11228 in breast cancer.

This study is trying to identify the right dose of a long-acting medicine called WIN378 for people with moderate or severe asthma. WIN378 blocks the action of a protein called TSLP which causes inflammation in the lung and may contribute to your asthma control and symptoms. The study will test how doses of WIN378 are handled by your body (pharmacokinetics) and assess the safety of the medicine and will assess markers of asthma inflammation in your breath and in your blood, lung function and asthma control (pharmacodynamics).

An 84-day, prospective, randomized (1:1) vehicle controlled, double-masked pre-market, crossover study. Subjects with moderate to severe oGVHD related Dry Eye Disease Each subject will receive both treatments in random sequence, each for 28 days, separated by a 14-day vehicle washout period.

rhPRG4-Sjögren's-002 is a prospective multi-center study conducted in Australia to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically-applied rhPRG4 in subjects with Sjögren's related Dry Eye Disease.

A study to evaluate the long-term safety of Deucravacitinib versus Ustekinumab in participants with psoriasis