ANZCTR search results

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell disease characterized by the growth of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and toxicity of etentamig (ABBV-383) when co-administered with pomalidomide-dexamethasone (Pd), lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd), or daratumumab-dexamethasone (Dd), in adult participants with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). Adverse events and change in disease activity will be assessed. Etentamig is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of R/R MM. Study doctors put the participants in groups called treatment arms. Etentamig co-administered with Pd, Rd, or Dd, will be explored. Each treatment arm receives a different treatment combination depending on stage of the study and eligibility. This study will include a dose escalation phase to determine the best dose of etentamig, followed by a dose expansion phase to confirm the dose. Approximately 320 adult participants with R/R MM will be enrolled in the study in approximately 48 sites worldwide. Participants will receive intravenous (IV) etentamig co-administered with oral/IV Pd, oral/IV Rd, or oral/IV/subcutaneous (SC) Dd in 28-day cycles. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at an approved institution (hospital or clinic). The effect of the treatment will be frequently checked by medical assessments, blood tests, questionnaires and side effects.

The aim of this study is to detect the presence of SENS-401 in the perilymph of participants undergoing cochlear implant surgery after 7 days of oral administration of SENS-401.

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS) (evaluated independently, as dual primary endpoints) in patients treated with intermittent regimen of Relacorilant in combination with nab-paclitaxel compared with patients treated with nab-paclitaxel monotherapy.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DVRd) followed by Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DVRd) followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Infection with bacteria or fungi can be deadly. Often, these types of infections can lead to an increase in the severity of illness requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonged duration of treatment and further risks associated with additional infections and superinfections. These are also called hospital acquired secondary infections. Patients who contract COVID-19 and require an ICU admission are at increased risk of contracting these secondary infections, and receive certain medications that can lower your body's immune response. In COVID-19 patients who require these treatments, it is unclear what affect these medications can have on developing an additional infection as well as the rate of recovery/survival. This study is evaluating the effect these medications have on the development of secondary infections and rate of survival of COVID-19 patients that have been admitted to ICUs.

A study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gantenerumab in amyloid-positive, cognitively unimpaired participants at risk for or at the earliest stages of AD. The planned number of participants for this study is approximately 1200 participants randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either gantenerumab or placebo (600 participants randomized to gantenerumab and 600 participants randomized to placebo).

Study RIN-PF-303 is a multinational study designed to evaluate the superiority of inhaled treprostinil against placebo for the change in absolute forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline to Week 52.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, drug levels, and preliminary efficacy of relatlimab plus nivolumab in pediatric and young adult participants with recurrent or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Primary objective: \- To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs. placebo in the proportion of patients dead or requiring IMV (or ECMO) by Day 28. Key secondary objectives: * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in all-cause mortality at day 180. * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in proportion of patients alive and discharged at day 28 * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in ventilatory-free days at day 28. * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in proportion of patients with IMV (or ECMO) by day 28. * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in length of primary hospital stay. Other efficacy objectives \- To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo on several disease severity/progression measures including recovery, ventilatory free days and mortality. Safety objectives: \- To evaluate safety and tolerability of oral reparixin versus placebo in the specific clinical setting.

The purpose of Part 1 of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of pirtobruitinib (LOXO-305) to ibrutinib in participants with CLL/SLL; participants may or may not have already had treatment for their cancer. The purpose of Part 2 of this study evaluates pirtobrutinib monotherapy in treatment-naïve participants with CLL/SLL with 17p deletions. Participation could last up to six years for Part 1. Participation could last up to 2 years for Part 2.