ANZCTR search results

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of the Transverse Medical, Inc. Point-Guard device. This feasibility study is a limited clinical investigation of the Point-Guard device. The study will be conducted to evaluate the device design concept with respect to clinical safety and device functionality.

The main purpose of this clinical trial is to test PAS-004 in people with at least one symptomatic plexiform neurofibroma due to Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1). The main questions it aims to answer are: * How well participants are able tolerate different doses of PAS-004, and * What side effects PAS-004 might have. This study will have two parts, Part A and Part B. The main goal of Part A of this study is to learn more about how participants tolerate different doses of PAS-004, and what side effects PAS-004 might have. What we learn from Part A of the study will help decide what doses of the study drug (PAS-004) should be used in Part B of the study, and if it is safe. In Part B, two different doses from Part A will be tested. The main goal of this part of the study is to keep studying any side effects of PAS-004 at those two dose levels, and to learn more about if the doses picked for this part of the study might have an effect on plexiform neurofibromas. Participants in Part A of the study who were taking doses selected for Part B may be able to continue on to Part B and keep taking the same dose of PAS-004 for 6 more months. Study participants in both parts will have regular visits to the study doctor and be asked to have tests and exams done to check on their health and safety, including blood draws and MRIs. Everyone participating in the study will take PAS-004 by mouth once a day during the study, in 28-day cycles. Participants will be asked to keep a diary to record their daily dose of study drug. Participants will continue on daily PAS-004 for up to 6 months, or until: * They decide to withdraw from the study, or * They experience unacceptable side effects, or * Their disease progresses, or another illness interferes with taking the study drug, or * The sponsor selects a dose level to study further in the next part of the study, or * The sponsor stops the study.

Researchers want to learn if V940 with pembrolizumab can stop advanced melanoma from growing or spreading. Melanoma is a type of skin cancer. Advanced means the cancer has spread to other parts of the body and cannot be removed with surgery. A standard (or usual) treatment for advanced melanoma is immunotherapy. Immunotherapy is a treatment that helps the immune system fight cancer. V940 is a study treatment designed to help a person's immune system attack their specific cancer. Pembrolizumab is an immunotherapy. The goal of this study is to learn if people who receive V940 with pembrolizumab live longer without the cancer growing or spreading than people who receive placebo with pembrolizumab. A placebo looks like the study treatment but has no study treatment in it. Using a placebo helps researchers better understand the effects of a study treatment.

The goal of this clinical trial is to collect information on vision outcomes in people aged 45 to 65 who have difficulty seeing clearly at near distances due to aging (a condition called presbyopia). All participants will receive the same treatment: laser eye surgery with the PRESBYOND method using the MEL 90 excimer laser. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * How well do patients see at distance, intermediate, and near after treatment? * How satisfied are patients with their vision after surgery? Participants will: * Attend seven visits over six months (before surgery and after surgery at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) * Undergo laser eye surgery with PRESBYOND * Complete vision tests and questionnaires about their experience There is no comparison group in this study.

The Phase IIIb NIAGARA-2 study aims to expand on the data from the Phase III NIAGARA study by investigating perioperative durvalumab in combination with investigator-selected cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (either ddMVAC or gemcitabine/cisplatin) in a clinical practice setting.

This Phase 1, first-in-human (FIH), dose-escalation and dose-expansion study is designed to evaluate the safety, PK, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of VIR-5525 as a monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with solid tumors that are known to express EGFR. The study will be conducted in the following 4 parts: * Part 1: VIR-5525 monotherapy dose escalation * Part 2: VIR-5525 monotherapy dose expansion * Part 3: VIR-5525 plus pembrolizumab dose escalation * Part 4: VIR-5525 plus pembrolizumab dose expansion

This study is a Phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label, clinical trial to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of ENV-501 in patients with advanced-stage, relapsed and/or refractory human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3)-expressing solid tumors. The study consists of 2 phases: a dose escalation phase (Phase 1) and a dose expansion phase (Phase 2). The primary objectives of Phase 1 are to characterize the overall safety and tolerability profile of increasing doses of ENV-501 in patients with advanced-stage solid tumors and identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ENV-501. During Phase 1, successive cohorts of patients will receive escalating doses of ENV-501. The results of the dose escalation will determine the RP2D and dosing schedule of ENV-501 to be administered in the Phase 2 part of the study. The primary objective of Phase 2 is to evaluate the preliminary clinical efficacy of ENV-501 in dose expansion cohorts.

The aim of the EMBRACE clinical trial is to compare outcomes (knee pain, symptoms, function and quality of life) between people with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture who are managed with either a novel bracing protocol (Cross Bracing Protocol), or with ACL reconstruction surgery. The main question that the trial aims to answer is: In individuals with acute ACL rupture, is management with the Cross Bracing Protocol more clinically effective and cost effective compared to early ACL reconstruction surgery? 180 people across five Australian cities, with a recent ACL injury, will be randomly allocated to one of two treatments. 1. Cross Bracing Protocol People who are allocated to the bracing treatment will: * wear a knee brace for 12 weeks * see a sports doctor * have 23 visits to a physiotherapist who will supervise their knee rehab over 12 months. * have two knee scans; 3 and 18 months after they enrol 2. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery People who are allocated to the surgery group will: * have surgery within 8 weeks of enrolling in the study * have 15 visits to a physiotherapist for their knee rehab over 12 months after surgery. * have one knee scan 18 months after they enrol. All participants will: * complete surveys at the beginning and 3, 6, 12 and 18 months later so the main trial outcomes can be collected, as well as additional information about their knee. * have knee imaging (Magnetic Resonance Imaging or MRI scan) so the overall condition of their knee can be assessed, as well as whether their ACL has healed.

This is a phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of tulisokibart in participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. The primary hypothesis is that at least 1 dose of tulisokibart is superior to placebo with respect to the proportion of participants achieving a 50% reduction in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50) at Week 16 (ie, at end of double-blind treatment).

The goal of this study is to check if the study device, the Akyva System, is safe to use and to find out if it has any possible side effects. Researchers will see if the study device can help you urinate without the need for catheterization, which involves passing a catheter (small tube) into the bladder, and if there is improvement in the leftover urine amount in your bladder after urinating or trying to urinate.