ANZCTR search results

The goal of this study is to compare how well sonrotoclax plus obinutuzumab works versus venetoclax plus rituximab in treating adults with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). The study will also compare how well sonrotoclax plus rituximab works versus venetoclax plus rituxumab in treating adults with R/R CLL/SLL. The safety of these treatments will also be assessed.

The intervention in this study consists of a 75-min intraduodenal infusion of an isotonic solution containing either calcium chloride (CaCl2) or control (saline). Participants enrolled into the study will receive, in randomised, double-blind fashion (i) saline (control), (ii) 500 mg CaCl2 or (iii) 1000 mg CaCl2, each occurring on separate sessions. Each study session will be 4-6 hours in duration and will be separated by 3-7 days. Studies will be carried out in the Clinical Research Facility of the Adelaide Medical School, the University of Adelaide, by staff and students trained in the required techniques.

This research project will assess how two treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (one dietary and one behavioral) work and for whom. This will be done by assessing moderators (what treatment works for who and in what context) and mediators (how treatment works). Investigators will also assess how the diet and behavioral treatments affect IBS symptoms during treatment. Participants will be randomized to either: i. A FODMAP diet online program that focuses on modifying the consumption of foods high or moderate in fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPS) to manage IBS symptoms. or, ii. An Exposure-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (E-CBT) online program for IBS that focuses on changing symptom-related behaviors which are known to worsen IBS symptoms.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), yet substantial uncertainties persist regarding its efficacy as a maintenance treatment. This prospective study seeks to investigate the efficacy of maintenance rTMS in individuals with TRD who have previously responded to an acute course of rTMS. In the R61 phase of the study, we will recruit 75 participants across three study sites, the University of California San Diego, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Australian National University, into a double-blind, three-arm maintenance treatment trial. In this trial, participants will be randomized to receive either standard maintenance rTMS, clustered maintenance rTMS, or sham maintenance rTMS for a duration of 6 months. Our primary aim is to examine the efficacy of maintenance rTMS on sustaining connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) measured through concurrent TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) at baseline and every six weeks throughout the 6-month treatment period. We will also assess changes in depressive symptom severity using clinical scales, including the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as a secondary outcome measure. It is hypothesized that stimulation with clustered maintenance rTMS will demonstrate superiority in sustaining DLPFC-SGC connectivity compared with standard maintenance rTMS and sham maintenance rTMS

This is a Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-and-multiple ascending dose study in which the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of orally administered MWN109 tablets will be assessed in healthy adult participants.

Jack Jumper ant (JJA) venom allergy is a uniquely Australian medical condition. It is the leading cause of venom allergy and affects up to three per cent of the population. 70 percent of people with JJA allergy will have another reaction on a repeat sting and this sensitivity appears to persist for many years. Venom immunotherapy (VIT) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment in the prevention of severe systemic allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) to future stings. It is currently offered to patients as standard care in Tasmania, South Australia and Victoria. However, whilst JJA VIT has been used for many years, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term benefit of the treatment and how it impacts patient quality of life. This trial will offer patients who have completed a JJA VIT program (between 3 and \< 6-years duration) and have been off-treatment for at least 18-months and \< 5 years, to have a supervised JJA sting challenge and blood test to assess their JJA venom tolerance level. It will also ask them to complete a set of questionnaires at different timepoints to obtain a history of their exposure and reactions to JJA stings outside of the hospital setting (field stings), and to measure the impact of the completed VIT and knowledge of their sting challenge outcome on their quality of life and their behaviours around auto-injectors. These measures will be used to explore the long-term effectiveness of JJA VIT and the impact of a sting challenge post VIT on a patient's quality of life.

This randomized trial compares two prescribing strategies to treat high blood pressure. One approach involves remote treatment informed by randomized trial evidence without regular monitoring of blood pressure ("fire and forget"), whilst the other involves usual care treatment with access to frequent blood pressure monitoring. The study will enrol participants with uncontrolled high blood pressure and randomize participants 1:1 to a "fire and forget" treatment group or a "more blood pressure monitoring" group for a total of 12 weeks. "Fire and forget" involves choosing the most appropriate treatment based on the highest quality evidence (randomized trial data), after which participants will stop measuring blood pressures until the end of study. The "more blood pressure monitoring" group will involve treatment as usual but with the access to frequent and high quality blood pressure monitoring. The goal of this research is to: 1. determine which prescribing approach is more effective at lowering blood pressure after 12 weeks (end of study) 2. assess the safety, feasibility and acceptability of the two treatment approaches.

This Phase 1a/1b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluates the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of subcutaneously (SC) administered TRB-061 in healthy adults and patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Part 1 (SAD): Healthy participants receiving single doses or placebo. Part 2 (MAD): Healthy participants receiving multiple doses (3 doses over 8 weeks) of TRB-061 or placebo. Part 3 (MAD+): Participants with moderate-to-severe AD receiving repeated doses (4 doses over 12 weeks) of TRB-061 or placebo.

The main purpose of this study is to assess how well JNJ-77242113 works when compared to placebo and ustekinumab in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess initial safety/tolerability of multiple doses of drug NAV-240. It will also learn about the profile and immunogenicity of drug NAV-240. The main question it aims to answer is: • What medical problems do participants have when taking multiple doses of drug NAV-240? Researchers will compare drug NAV-240 to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if any medical problems participants have differ between those taking drug NAV-240 and those taking placebo.