ANZCTR search results

Snake bite affects thousands of Australians every year, but few die as a result due to high quality first aid and timely medical care. Good first aid should be simple, standardised, use minimal or readily available equipment, and be able to be utilised effectively with no or minimal training by the rescuer. Over time the first aid methods used to manage snake bite in Australia have been questioned due to issues with efficacy, and some emerging evidence of harm from their use. There is little experimental data in the literature to support current first aid practices, and what exists suggests further research is required. This study aims to examine and compare the effectiveness of two first aid methods by tracking the movement of a mock venom through the body when each first aid method is used. This will provide important information about the suitability of current techniques used in Australia and whether a proposed simpler alternative technique is as effective. Currently, initial treatment of snake bite involves early first aid with the application of a pressure bandage and immobilisation (PBI) of the limb. There is limited data to support the basis of this technique and emerging evidence of harm when applied incorrectly. This project sets out to evaluate PBI compared to another technique involving the application of a pressure pad (PP) at the bite site (which is easier to do, and used in many countries outside of Australia). The project aims to determine whether each technique is effective, and whether the PP technique is at least as effective as PBI. To do this 24 participants will be recruited to undergo study with mock venom injected into their hand or foot and having either PBI or PP applied. The mock venom will then be traced with a gamma camera to determine rate of flow through the lymphatic system, which is how venom travels in the body. It is expected that the project will demonstrate the efficacy of both techniques, and that the PP will be at least as effective as PBI. This will provide a basis for change in the current first aid recommendations for snake bite first aid in Australia, and improve the care provided.

A Phase 1/2a Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Whole-Body Distribution, and Preliminary Clinical Activity of 161Tb-RAD402, a Radiolabeled Anti-KLK3 Monoclonal Antibody Targeting Free Prostate-Specific Antigen, in Participants with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well JNJ-79635322 works when compared with an anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)xCD3 bispecific antibody.

The FENRTT2 study will investigate the efficacy and safety of a medicinal cannabis plant extract with extremely low THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), NTI164, on Rett syndrome (RTT) in a crossover design. RTT is a devastating rare genetic condition affecting females and involves debilitating physical and intellectual symptoms. NTI164 is an oil which has demonstrated efficacy in reducing symptoms in several paediatric neurological conditions, including RTT, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and paediatric acute-onset neuropsychicatric syndrome (PANS). A Phase I/II clinical trial of NTI164 in RTT (FENRTT1/NTIRTT1) showed NTI164 is safe in this population and significantly improved overall clinical severity of illness, as well as core RTT symptoms, including anxiety, mental alertness, communication skills, socialisation/eye contact, and attentiveness. The FENRTT2 study will investigate NTI164 in a larger number of patients, and compare NTI164 to a placebo control. Research tests on patient blood will also be included to further investigate how NTI164 works in the body.

This is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study investigating the efficacy of a full-spectrum medicinal cannabis plant extract on core and associated ASD symptoms over placebo. Participants will be randomly allocated to either NTI164 or placebo at a 1:1 ratio and blood samples will be collected and surveys completed at baseline and Week 16. This study will expand efficacy and safety data of NTI164 and provide additional mechanism of action data of NTI164 in this patient cohort.

A phase 2 randomised, three-arm, parallel-group, dose-ranging trial to determine safety, efficacy and optimal dosing of intravenous anakinra in premature neonates, with subcutaneous pharmacokinetic sub-study.

This study will look at how well CagriSema and cagrilintide help children and adolescents with excess body weight lose weight. The study has 2 parts: main and extension study. In the main study, participants will either get CagriSema (a new study drug), cagrilintide (a new study drug), semaglutide (a drug that doctors can already prescribe to adolescents and adults) or placebo (a placebo looks like the treatment being tested, but doesn't have any active ingredients in it). Which treatment participants will get is decided by chance. Participants who get semaglutide in the main study will not take part in the extension study. If participants take part in the extension study, they will get either CagriSema or cagrilintide in this part of the study. Like all drugs, the study drugs may have side effects. The total time participants will be in the main study is about 1 year and 6 months. If participants take part in the extension study, the total time is about 4 years and 10 months.

Many babies born very preterm (\<32 weeks of pregnancy) require support to breathe from a breathing machine (mechanical ventilator) via a breathing tube. Although this keeps babies alive, it can damage their lungs. To reduce this damage, doctors and nurses try to change babies to gentler breathing support that does not require a breathing tube. This is usually done using a method called nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) that uses a nosepiece to deliver breaths. This process of removing the breathing tube is called "extubation". Many babies will need the breathing tube put back in after extubation (for various reasons) and this is independently associated with poorer outcomes. This research study aims to compare two ways of performing extubation - both of which are already used regularly by doctors and nurses. The "standard extubation" approach involves taking a baby's breathing tube out first, then applying the nosepiece and starting nCPAP. The more recent approach, called "prePAP", involves applying the nosepiece and starting nCPAP before taking the breathing tube out. Previous research suggests that a prePAP approach may provide better support for babies during extubation. However, larger studies are required before this approach is more commonly used. This study is investigating whether extubating the baby with prePAP is better than extubating the baby without prePAP. The main question it aims to answer is: Does initiating nCPAP before extubation in very preterm babies reduce the fall in their oxygen levels post-extubation?

This study is designed to characterize the safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity of MDX2003 in patients with different types of lymphoma

This Phase 1, first-in-human study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of CLYM116 in healthy volunteers.