ANZCTR search results

Determine the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IV administered VIP236 as monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumor cancer

Nitrate is a controversial component of vegetables, meat, and drinking water. The now well-established benefits of nitrate, through the enterosalivary nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide (NO) pathway, on cardiovascular risk factors and long-term cardiovascular disease risk are tarnished by a continuing concern about a link between nitrate ingestion and cancer. This can result in misguided advice to avoid consumption of high-nitrate leafy green vegetables by both the media and the scientific literature. A recent media headline stated, "Cancer alert over rocket: trendy salad leaves exceed safe levels of carcinogenic nitrates in one in every ten samples". One scientific review stated, "the presence of nitrate in vegetables, as in water and generally in other foods, is a serious threat to man's health". Controversy in the literature, and gaps in the knowledge are leading to confusing messages around vegetables that may play a critical role in cardiovascular health. The major dietary sources of nitrate are vegetables, meat, and drinking water. Source of nitrate could be a crucial factor determining whether the consumption of nitrate is linked with beneficial (such as improving cardiovascular health) versus harmful (N-nitrosamine formation) effects. For example, unlike meat and water-derived nitrate, vegetables contain high levels of vitamin C and/or polyphenols that may inhibit the production of N-nitrosamines. So far, no study has investigated the formation of N-nitrosamines after consumption of these different sources in humans. This study will compare N-nitrosamine formation after intake of water with and without added nitrate.

This study aims to collect data in newly implanted cochlear implant-recipients to inform future development of fitting methods to optimally and efficiently program a cochlear implant.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections in children. Up to 50% of UTI's are caused by multi-drug resistant ESBL-producing gram negative bacteria that do not respond to treatment with oral penicillin's or cephalosporins. Instead, children often require hospital admission to receive broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics when they may otherwise be safely managed at home; resulting in prolonged hospital stays and an increased use of health resources. Fosfomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic discovered in 1969 that remains susceptible to a large number of organisms due to its low international use. Fosfomycin can be prepared as an oral solution with an orange/tangerine flavour and is currently approved for use in females \>12 years old. Despite extensive evidence of its efficacy in adults and safety in neonates, the use of fosfomycin in children remains limited and fosfomycin is not currently licensed for use in children \<12 years old in Australia. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the use of oral fosfomycin against standard of care antibiotics for the treatment of antibiotic resistant urinary tract infections in children. The main questions the trial aims to answer are: 1. Is oral fosfomycin non-inferior in efficacy to the current standard of care for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant urinary tract infections in children? 2. Is oral fosfomycin a safe and well-tolerated antibiotic in children? 3. What is the best dosing regimen of oral fosfomycin for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant UTIs in children?

The main purpose of Part A of the study is to evaluate safety, tolerability and tracer uptake after a single intravenous (IV) administration of \[68Ga\]Ga-DPI-4452 for each tumor type such as clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and colorectal cancer (CRC); Part B: is to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) \[maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or lower dose\] for \[177Lu\]Lu-DPI-4452 for each tumor type such as ccRCC, PDAC, CRC, and urothelial carcinoma (UC); Part C: is to evaluate the preliminary antitumor activity of \[177Lu\]Lu-DPI-4452 as monotherapy for each tumor type such as ccRCC, PDAC, CRC, and UC; Part D: is to assess the diagnostic concordance between \[68Ga\]Ga-DPI-4452 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and the histopathology result of the Indeterminate Renal Mass (IDRM); Part E: is to assess \[68Ga\]Ga-DPI-4452 uptake in each tumour type such as UC, muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), head and neck cancer (H\&N), triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and any other tumor with locally confirmed carbonic anhydrase (CA) IX expression except ccRCC, CRC and PDAC.

The purpose of this follow-up study was to describe the safety in subsequent pregnancies in participants who were previously administered the RSVPreF3 maternal vaccine or control during any prior RSV MAT study. The study participants enrolled in this follow-up study received RSVPreF3 maternal vaccination (any dose) or controls during the following prior RSV MAT studies: RSV MAT-001 (NCT03674177), RSV MAT-004 (NCT04126213), RSV MAT-010 (NCT05045144), RSV MAT-011 (NCT04138056), RSV MAT-009 (NCT04605159), RSV MAT-012 (NCT04980391) and RSV MAT-039 (NCT05169905). No intervention was administered in this study. The exposure was the intervention (either RSVPreF3 vaccine or control) received by the study participants in the abovementioned prior RSV MAT studies.

The main purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy (Myeloma response) of subcutaneous (SC) isatuximab treatment in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in adult participants with RRMM having received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, and to characterize the PK of isatuximab in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone after manual and On Body Delivery System (OBDS) administration. After confirmation of the feasibility of SC isatuximab by manual administration, patient will be randomized to 1 of the 2 delivery methods of SC isatuximab.

The is a non-randomized pilot trial, open-label evaluation of the physiologic response of native kidney denervation using the Paradise denervation system in CKD, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), and Heart failure (HF)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether milvexian compared to placebo reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke.

COMPLETE-2 is a prospective, multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a strategy of physiology-guided complete revascularization to angiography-guided complete revascularization in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who have undergone successful culprit lesion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). COMPLETE-2 OCT is a large scale, prospective, multi-centre, observational, imaging study of patients with STEMI or NSTEMI and multivessel CAD in a subset of eligible COMPLETE-2 patients.