ANZCTR search results

These search results are from the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR).

You can narrow down the results using the filters

32712 results sorted by trial registration date.
  • A trial to investigate if aspirin reduces the risk of developing ovarian cancer in high risk women with abnormalities in their BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene (or both).

    This study is testing if taking aspirin (also known as acetylsalicylic acid or ASA for short) may help prevent ovarian cancer in women with a high-risk gene mutation, BRCA1 or BRCA2, who plan to have the standard risk-reducing surgery. Who is it for? You may be eligible to join this study if you are a woman aged 18 years or above, and you have a gene change or mutation called BRCA1 or BRCA2, which puts you at high risk for getting ovarian cancer. Also you are scheduled, sometime in the next 6 months to 2 years, to have a surgery to reduce your risk by removing your fallopian tubes and ovaries. Study details Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups, Group A or Group B. Patients in Group A will be given aspirin in the form of a pill, to be taken by mouth every day for between 6 months to 2 years, before you have your scheduled risk-reducing surgery. You will have an equal chance of receiving either the low or the high dose of aspirin; low dose of aspirin is 81 mg per day and high dose of aspirin is 325 mg per day. Patients in Group B will be given a placebo in the form of a pill, to be taken by mouth every day for between 6 months to 2 years, before you have your scheduled risk-reducing surgery. A placebo is a medication with no active ingredients that is identical in appearance to the real medication. The purpose of the study is to find out whether taking aspirin (also known as acetylsalicylic acid or ASA for short) may help prevent ovarian cancer in women with a high-risk gene mutation, BRCA1 or BRCA2, who plan to have surgery to reduce the risk of developing cancer.

  • The feasibility of using a smartphone app and clinician portal to encourage and support healthy living behaviours for people with mental illness

    This project is a collaboration between Sunshine Coast PHN (PIR), Mental Health and Addiction Services, Sunshine Coast HHS and CSIRO’s Australian eHealth Research Centre to conduct a feasibility study among 40 clients at the Sunshine Coast University HHS. The aim is to ascertain levels of program efficacy and successful health-related outcomes. Through developing an innovative platform comprised of a smartphone app and internet-based clinician web portal, it aims to support persons with diagnosed mental illness in self-management but will also enhance multidisciplinary care provision. The smartphone app accompanies and guide persons with diagnosed mental illness through their treatment journey by monitoring health measures, delivering simple interactive questionnaires and providing educational and motivational multimedia content. The web-portal enables clinical care providers to view their clients’ progress and provide individualised feedback and/or early care intervention dependent on the advice of the clinical review.

  • A study of pembrolizumab following chemoimmunotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma

    The purpose of this study is to determine if a standard chemotherapy induction therapy followed by maintenance using pembrolizumab will be effective in maintaining life expectancy with minimal side effects for participants. Who is it for? You may be eligible for this study if you are an adult with has been diagnose with primary central nervous system lymphoma. Study details All participants in this study will complete a standard induction treatment followed by pembrolizumab, via a drip into the blood vessel, every 3 weeks for 2 years. Throughout the study scans will be performed at various time points such as Magnetic Reasonance imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET scans) to take pictures inside your body. Blood samples will also be taken throughout the treatment period, however these are the same as you would have taken during standard treatment outside of the trial. It is hoped that this treatment will result in a better prognosis for those with primary central nervous system lymphoma, with less severe side effects.

  • Feasibility of Water irrigation following resection of bladder tumour

    The purpose of this study is to determine if continuous irrigation of the bladder using sterile water for at least 3 hours is feasible and safe in bladder tumour resection. Who is it for? You may be eligible for this study if you are an adult who is suspected of having bladder cancer. Study details Standard surgery for bladder tumours involves irrigation of the bladder during and after the surgery using sterile saline (salt water). If you participate in this study, you will have sterile water used for this irrigation during and for at least 3 hours after surgery instead. If irrigation using water is found to be feasible and safe, it can then be assessed further to see if it can prevent the bladder cancer. from coming back. This could have a major impact on treating bladder cancer

  • A retrospective cohort study to evaluate outcomes in carotid endartertomy vs carotid artery stenting in carotid artery disease

    Stroke is the most common life threatening and debilitating neurological disorder. It is commonly caused by the flicking off of plaque from calcified arteries in the neck region in patients with atherosclerotic internal carotid artery stenosis. This study retrospectively compares the outcomes after 2 different treatment options for carotid artery stenosis: carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterecromy (CEA). All patients who underwent either procedure performed by the primary surgeon, in 4 locations will be included. Specific outcome measures are: (1) post procedure occurrence of further clots in the arteries supplying the brain and (2) post procedure occurrence of external carotid (a branch of the artery being operated on) occlusion. In order to measure these outcomes, we will compare the clinical examination findings as well as imaging (MRI, ultrasound, CT angiography) results pre and post operatively. As CEA is currently the gold standard for treating this condition, we predict that long term outcomes are better in CEA as compared to CAS.

  • Older Adult Closed Loop (ORACL) Study for Type 1 Diabetes

    This study aims to compare how effectively a closed-loop automated insulin delivery system maintains an individual’s glucose levels in a healthy range compared with insulin delivered via a pump with doses determined in a manual way together with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) via a glucose sensor. All participants will undertake the study over a 9 to 11-month period, completing two study stages in random order, each of 4-month duration 1) Closed-loop with automated basal insulin delivery, 2) Open-loop with manual insulin delivery via pump and CGM.  Outcomes of interest include glucose levels and other non-glucose parameters such as physical well-being, cognitive functioning, psychosocial well-being, sleep, glucose patterns while driving and caregiver burden.  These results will help us to understand whether automated insulin delivery systems may benefit an older cohort, and help to further refine systems for future iterations.

  • Comparison of plate waste and reasons for plate waste in maternity patients using a room service model (a la carte menu) and a 14-day cyclical menu.

  • An observational study investigating and auditing the safety, tolerability and further efficacy characteristics of a pharmaceutical grade cannabis medicine (NanaBis™) prescribed to eligible patients for the management of cancer related or non-cancer related pain in general and specialty medical practices.

  • Effect of 'Teach-back', a simple communication tool, on disease knowledge in people with chronic hepatitis B

    Limited health literacy has great impact on patient health outcomes; poorer knowledge of disease is linked with suboptimal self-care, reduced treatment adherence and increased use of emergency services. Studies conducted to assess health literacy and patient understanding amongst patients living with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have revealed gaps in disease-specific knowledge. Despite this, there are few studies evaluating strategies to improve patient knowledge of hepatitis B. The 'teach-back' strategy is a communication tool that has been shown to be successful in improving disease-specific knowledge in other areas of health. 'Teach-back' ensures the health provider checks for understanding with patients and then allowing opportunity for clarification. This study hypothesises that there is a poor baseline understanding amongst patients living with CHB and that the teach-back method will improve disease-specific knowledge. This would form the foundation for future studies to evaluate how improved understanding translates into greater health outcomes.

  • Training Attention in Children with Acquired Brain Injury

    Childhood inattention has been linked with poor academic outcomes, as well as increased risk of social, occupational and psychological problems later in life. Children with an Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) are particularly susceptible to attention deficits following their injury and may benefit from interventions aimed at enhancing attention. Training Attention and Learning Initiative (TALI Train), an adaptive cognitive training program, is a novel approach to improving attention capacity in young children. The impetus to develop this training program came from both the lack of suitable non-invasive, non-pharmacological treatments for young children with attention difficulties, and mounting evidence that targeted training can have a positive lasting impact on cognitive functions. TALI Train is yet to be trialled in children with an ABI and as such, its efficacy in this group is unknown. The primary objective of this study is therefore to evaluate whether the TALI Train program is able to reduce attention difficulties in children with an ABI. It is hypothesised that the training intervention will promote greater gains in cognitive attention (selective, sustained and attentional control) than the active control program. Secondary objectives include assessing comparative effects of the intervention and active control program on untrained areas including academic achievement, working memory and social functioning. In addition, this study will examine the potential predictors of training outcomes in children with an ABI including baseline attention abilities, the family environment, socioeconomic status, and parental mental health. Participants in this double blind, randomised controlled trial will be children with an ABI, aged between 4 years and 9 years 11 months. They will be randomly allocated to either (a) TALI Train (intervention group) or (b) an active control group using a program that is non-adaptive and has limited attention training potential. Both programs are delivered on a tablet, and children complete one 20 minute training session at home five times a week for a five week period. The efficacy of TALI Train compared to the placebo program will be assessed at pre-training and post-training, as well as at a 3-month and a 6-month follow-up.

Tags:
  • Finding clinical trials